VERSE PERMUTATION EXPERIMENT FOR ELS MAP 1 START
To verse permute the control, or not. To wrap the text, or not....these are the questions.
On July 19, 2009, after a decade old request by me for a control text in CodeFinder that was based not on the existing letter-permuted text, but rather on a verse-permuted Torah text, Dr. Robert Haralick finally sent me 10 such control texts. Why is this important? It is important because the commercially available control scrambles the Torah so thoroughly that the file is useless for matching axis terms to words in the open text of Torah. For example, in the Torah the word Israel appears 591 times at skip +1. Egypt appears 365 times in like manner But in the existing control at the same +1 skip Israel appears just once, and Egypt does not appear at all. In the new verse-permuted control files by Dr. Haralick, Israel again appears 591 times, and Egypt is there 365 times again. Thus, although axis terms will appear at different ELSs than in the real Torah, when using a verse-permuted Torah text as a control, we are just as likely to get matches of an axis term (generally appearing vertically) running through an open text term (or verse) as in the Torah. Unlike the letter-permuted Torah text which is pure nonsense to the reader, we are given a legitimate chance to explore the value of matches, especially where course angles between terms are of interest. Tables below will show how the 10 new files stacked up with comparison to the Torah and original letter-permuted files currently available on CodeFinder. This exploration is conducted based on key terms on ELS Map 1, which I believe points the way to where the Ark of the Covenant will be found.
In the first Table below we find that the minimum ELS of Ark of the Covenant found in Torah is clearly lower than all of the ELSs of this term in the 10 verse permuted and one letter permuted Torah texts. With CodeFinder with the row skip function disabled, and a maximum window of 80 columns and 80 rows, there were no matches of Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying, the phrase that started my 12 year ( and ongoing) quest to find the Ark via ELS Maps in the Torah Code. This compares to the 104 letters required to put Ark of the Covenant in a box with the minimum ELS of Egyptians were burying in the Torah. When I enabled the row split function, there still were no matches seen in the verse permuted Torah with Egyptians were burying in unwrapped Torah when the computer makes only one pass through Torah. What does this mean? Well, when excluding the open text hits for Ark of the Covenant, there were 45 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant in the 10 verse permuted files, each with 8 verses that ran directly through an ELS of Ark of the Covenant. So we had 45 X 8 = 380 lines where an Egyptians were burying could theoretically appeared in the matrix with Ark of the Covenant. When we hit the row split function, we opened up another 380 lines that might have worked for a match, but with no positive results. Each window seen had 6,400 letters in it. Table 2 below shows what happens when we turn on the wrapped matrix function and allow more than one pass through the verse permuted Torah? That will surely produce many more opportunities to match Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying.
While the Code required only 117 letters to show Ark of the Covenant with Bardawil, the lake the surrounds the suspect site, in the 11 control texts used, the best match (smallest matrix) under the conditions specified in Table 1 required 357 letters.
TABLE 1 - 10 TORAH TEXTS PERMUTATED AT THE VERSE LEVEL, NO ROW SPLIT PERMITTED, SEARCH AREA 80 ROWS BY 8O COLUMNS, NO WRAPPED TORAH ALLOWED (SEARCH RESTRICTED TO ONE PASS THROUGH THE TORAH)
FILE | MINIMUM ELS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT | NUMBER OF ELS HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT (6 IS THE OPEN TEXT NUMBER FOR THE TORAH FILE AND FOR ALL TORAH VERSE PERMUTED FILES) | ELS OF NON OPEN TEXT HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT | SIZE OF MATRIX REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING IN THE OPEN TEXT | SIZE OF MATRIX REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND AND ELS OF BARDAWIL | SIZE OF MATRIX REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT, BARDAWIL, AND EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING IN THE OPEN TEXT |
TORAH | -306 | 13 | -306 3eight: normal" align="center">3102 3621 -8752 9698 15677 24926 | 104 LETTERS | 117 LETTERS | 225 LETTERS |
VERSE PERM 1 | 2087 | 11 | 2087 -11380 -18626 18897 25661 | NO MATCHES | 3445 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 2 | -1033 | 10 | -1033 5969 6073 -31877 | NO MATCHES | 357, 700 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 3 | -2290 | 10 | -2290 3254 9691 34880 | NO MATCHES | 844 | 1080 |
VERSE PERM 4 | 5572 | 10 | 5572 7671 31416 40805 | NO MATCHES | 363 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 5 | 2110 | 11 | 2110 -8599 -16647 -19419 -24829 | NO MATCHES | 1482 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 6 | -9931 | 9 | -9931 -12563 -17537 | NO MATCHES | 594 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 7 | 13478 | 9 | 13478 -14004 27935 | NO MATCHES | NO MATCHES | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 8 | 12566 | 9 | 12566 -23701 -33660 | NO MATCHES | NO MATCHES | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 9 | -3513 | 13 | -3513 -9853 -11928 -14326 23438 -31431 36527 | NO MATCHES | 1443 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
VERSE PERM 10 | -6319 | 13 | -6319 -6565 10060 17018 -19552 28600 -33037 | NO MATCHES | 480, 532 | NO DUAL MATCHES |
LETTER PERM 1 | -7072 | 5 | -38254 | NO MATCHES | NO MATCHES | NO MATCHES |
ABOVE: ELS MAP 1
TABLE 2
MATCHES OF ARK OF THE COVENANT
WITH
EGYPTIANS WERE BURING
IN WRAPPED AND UNWRAPPED TORAH AND VERSE PERMUTED TORAH
FILE | MINIMUM ELS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT | NUMBER OF NON OPEN TEXT ELS HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT WITH WRAPPED SEARCH FUNCTION DISABLED (SKIPS -43544 TO +43544) # | ELSs OF NON OPEN TEXT HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT WITH WRAPPED MATRIX FUNCTION ENABLED (SKIPS -152202 TO +152203 SEARCHED) # | MATCHES WITH ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING WITH WRAPPED MATRIX FUNCTION ENABLED | SIZE OF MATRIX IN LETTERS REQUIRED FOR AN ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING IN THE OPEN TEXT |
TORAH | -306 | 7 (-306, 3102 3621 -8752 9698 15677 24926) | 35 | 2 | 104 LETTERS @ SKIP -306*; 609 LETTERS @ SKIP 133264 |
VERSE PERM 1 | 2087 | 5 (2087 -11380 -18626 18897 25661) | 39 | 5 | 363 LETTERS @ SKIP 29433; 1100 LETTERS @ SKIP-102512 1500 LETTERS @ SKIP 81395; 3016 LETTERS @ SKIP -82555; 972 LETTERS @ SKIP 117500 |
VERSE PERM 2 | -1033 | 4 (-1033 5969 6073 -31877) | 47 | 4 | 1850 LETTERS @ SKIP 82134 3100 LETTERS @ SKIP 30341 812 LETTERS @ SKIP 81268
792 LETTERS @ SKIP -134569
|
VERSE PERM 3 | -2290 | 4 (-2290 3254 9691 34880) | 46 | 4 | 391 LETTERS @ SKIP -40565 2016 LETTERS @SKIP 51432 1476 LETTERS @ SKIP -93843
1160 LETTERS @ SKIP 102344
|
VERSE PERM 4 | 5572 | 4 (5572 7671 31416 40805) | 40 | 5 | 578 LETTERS @ SKIP -58552 1530 LETTERS @ SKIP 37565 1260 LETTERS @ SKIP 109588 836 LETTERS @ SKIP 146859 1044 LETTERS @ SKIP 76647 |
VERSE PERM 5 | 2110 | 5 (2110 -8599 -16647 -19419 -24829) | 33 | 0 | |
VERSE PERM 6 | -9931 | 3 (-9931 -12563 -17537) | 34 | 4 | 1568 LETTERS @ SKIP -31984 540 LETTERS @ SKIP 35854; 950 LETTERS @ SKIP 108479 1008 LETTERS @ SKIP 149930 |
VERSE PERM 7 | 13478 | 3 (13478 -14004 27935) | 53 | 5 | 363 LETTERS @ SKIP -21087 850 LETTERS @ SKIP 34165 1400 LETTERS @ SKIP -34396 280 LETTERS @ SKIP-113463 1850 LETTERS @ SKIP -141512 |
VERSE PERM 8 | 12566 | 3 (12566 -23701 -33660) | 34 | 3 | 1260 LETTERS @ SKIP -74120 3400 LETTERS @ SKIP-144819 1677 LETTERS @ SKIP-94062 |
VERSE PERM 9 | -3513 | 7 (-3513 -9853 -11928 -14326 23438 -31431 36527) | 45 | 9 | 693 LETTERS @ SKIP -23432 1700 LETTERS @ SKIP -34946; 1800 LETTERS @ SKIP -114214; 231 LETTERS @ SKIP 45084; 110 LETTERS @ SKIP 55538 1395 LETTERS @ SKIP 23438 1400 LETTERS @ SKIP -34946 1040 LETTERS @ SKIP 49273 1548 LETTERS @SKIP -110848 |
VERSE PERM 10 | -6319 | 7 (-6319 -6565 10060 17018 -19552 28600 -33037) | 43 | 4 | 1140 LETTERS @ SKIP -6565; 242 LETTERS @ SKIP 114429; 1008 LETTERS @ SKIP 122628; 702 LETTERS @ SKIP 147124 |
*Note: Skip -306 is minimum for all studies of permuted and non permuted Torah texts, wrapped and unwrapped texts, with row split function enabled and disabled. Likewise, the matrix size is 104 letters is also at minimum area for all these studies.
This match is what inspired 12 years of Code study thus far by this author.
# These numbers do not include the 6 open text mentions of Ark of the Covenant in Torah and in each of the 10 verse permuted Torah texts used.
With the wrapped matrix function enabled there were 414 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant in the 10 verse-permuted Torah texts, and 35 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant in the Torah file (again, the ELS at skip -306 is the lowest skip seen on any of these files). In addition, each of these files includes the 6 open text occurrences of Ark of the Covenant, however these 6 are not germane to the current discussion. So, with the 34 additional ELS of Ark of the Covenant in the Torah, added to the 414 in the verses permuted files, we had 448 ELSs of Ark of the Covenant (with 8 lines for each) in which there might be a match with the one occurrence in each file of Egyptians were burying. How many matches were there? With row splitting adding to the 448*8 or 3,581 lines where we would first look for matches, there were 43 matches in the verse permuted wrapped texts, and one more in wrapped Torah. The smallest matrix after the match in Torah with the -306 ELS was 110 letters (compared to 104 letters needed to show Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying on ELS Map 1). This occurrence was with the 9th permuted file, at skip 55,538 in wrapped text. Chi square values for matches of Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying were as expected with the permuted files when they were not wrapped (i.e., the computer made one pass through the text), but there were many more matches than expected when the permuted files were allowed to wrap. This might indicate a need for my spreadsheet to factor in number of computer passes through the Torah when computing the significance of matches with wrapped text. If so, the new files by Dr. Haralick are already leading to a better comprehension of what it means to wrap text, especially when matching an axis term with an open text term or phrase. As can by seen by Table 3, the average row split required to match Ark of the Covenant with Egyptians were burying was close to 4. This would indicate an need to downgrade the value of such matches by a factor of 4.
TABLE 3
ROW SPLITS REQUIRED FOR
MATCHES OF ARK OF THE COVENANT
WITH
EGYPTIANS WERE BURING
IN WRAPPED AND UNWRAPPED TORAH AND VERSE PERMUTED TORAH
FILE | ELSs OF NON OPEN TEXT HITS FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT WITH WRAPPED MATRIX FUNCTION ENABLED (SKIPS -152202 TO +152203 SEARCHED) # | MATCHES WITH ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING | ROW SPLIT REQUIRED FOR MATCHES WITH ELS OF ARK OF THE COVENANT AND EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING (NOTE: A ROW SPLIT OF 1 = NO ROW SPLIT REQUIRED FOR ARK OF THE COVENANT TO SEE EGYPTIANS WERE BURYING). |
TORAH | 35 | 2 | 1 1 |
VERSE PERM 1 | 39 | 5 | 3 7 7 7 5 |
VERSE PERM 2 | 47 | 4 | 7 1 7 4 |
VERSE PERM 3 | 46 | 4 | 1 6 5 4 |
VERSE PERM 4 | 40 | 5 | 1 3 5 2 5 |
VERSE PERM 5 | 33 | 0 | N/A |
VERSE PERM 6 | 34 | 4 | 3 5 4 3 |
VERSE PERM 7 | 53 | 5 | 7 3 7 7 1 |
VERSE PERM 8 | 34 | 3 | 5 1 7 |
VERSE PERM 9 | 45 | 9 | 3 5 1 2 7 1 1 5 5 |
VERSE PERM 10 | 43 | 4 | 4 1 5 3 |
AVERAGE ROW SPLIT | | 178/45= 3.955 |
# These numbers do not include the 6 open text mentions of Ark of the Covenant in Torah and in each of the 10 verse permuted Torah texts used.
The addition of these 10 verse permuted files to CodeFinder would constitute a tremendous aid for researchers trying to evaluate the significance of ELS terms intersecting open text material, especially when that material is a priori. While Egyptians were burying was not a priori on the night that I tried to find a map in the Torah, the subsequent course angles found as seen in ELS maps 1,2,3,4,5,11,2,13,14, and 15 were certainly a priori in that they were linked to real world maps.