OBAMA USES ALDRIN, STONEWALLS ON MARS MISSION

NASA'S NEWEST DELAY TACTIC. On September 14, 2011, NASA announced plans to develop the Space Launch System - an advanced heavy-lift launch vehicle (HLV) designed to carry the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, as well as cargo and equipment to the International Space Station, and ultimately to deep space.  The rocket will have an initial lift capacity of 70 tonnes evolvable to 130 tonnes. The first flight is targeted for late 2017. Sound promising? The beauty of this  program is only skin deep. The Mars Society Steering Committee, with a vote of 12 yes and 8 absentions,  issued a statement that concluded, "The proposed plan is to spend $3 billion per year to get the HLV flying by 2017, without anything for it to launch until a putative asteroid mission in 2025. The Mars Society believes that this plan will almost guarantee program cancellation."

THE FIRST MATRIX: B. OBAMA DELAYING MARS. On the matrix above, the axis term is DELAYING MARS. This is the only ELS of the 10-letter term. It is relatively rare to find a 10-letter a-priori term like it.  At the same exact skip (-70,216) is ALIEN. My son and I have done extensive research on the Martian atmosphere, and in particular on dust storms and dust devils there. Crossing the axis term in the open text is DUST FROM THE HEAVENS. Although transliterations of Obama usually are spelled alef vav bet mem hey, another valid transliteration is alef vav bet mem alef. At skip -1 on this matrix is B. OBAMA. This is the only time in Torah that this name occurs at skip -1 or +1 with either spelling of OBAMA. In the open text is WAR. After waiting most of my life to see the U.S. follow up its manned flights to the moon with similar missions to Mars, I have only recently come to believe that our Government will never allow such unclassified missions, not just because of concerns about aliens on Mars in its distant past, but also because of the implications of recent findings by Dr. John Brandenburg that indicate there was once a horrendous war on that planet. The space-faring nations of the world do not want this message to go public because it would have disastrous results in terms on general panic, and because they would not likely survive such a panic. But the proof for such a charge will not be found in the controversial Torah Code. It can only provide hints. My son and I have evidence that Martian air pressure is higher than our Government admits to now. We will present it at the 14^th International Mars Society Convention in Dallas. Most of our work is found at Mars links.  But the real final link in the picture is provided by Brandenburg.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRIX. Although it is rare to find an a-priori axis term (here DELAYING MARS) that is 10 letters in length, as per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is attached to it. For one thing, there were shorter (3 and 4 letter) versions of MARS that I sought. While the phase DUST FROM THE HEAVENS certainly has meaning in terms of this family’s Martian research, it was found a-posteriori, and as such no statistical significance is associated with it either. So this leaves us only with ALIEN at a special case skip (here that of the axis term), B. OBAMA at skip -1 and WAR, all of which were found a-priori. For terms found in the open text, I only check the Torah for its frequency at skip +1. But for ALIEN and B. OBAMA I checked the Torah for their frequencies at all special case skips (+1, -1, and the absolute skip of the axis term).  There are synonyms for ALIEN, but I prefer the one found here because it is used most often in the Torah. This version of WAR occurs 36 times in Torah. As such, there was 1 chance in 21 to find it on the 400-letter matrix. While it only occurs once in Torah at skips -1 or +1, we must also check for the frequency with both spellings of B. OBAMA at skips +/- 70,216. This version of ALIEN is found at a special case skip against odds of about 40 to 1. B. OBAMA at a special case skip appears on the matrix against odds of 381 to 1. The combined terms WAR, B. OBAMA and ALIEN all appear on the matrix in this fashion against odds of 335,731 to 1 (p value 2.87 E-6). As such, this is an extremely significant matrix.

HISTORY OF THE ALDRIN MARS CONTROVERSY, SELL OUT TO OBAMA, AND AWAKENING. Click here to hear Buzz Aldrin's speech on July 25, 2009 about a Monolith on Phobos, a moon of Mars.  Note how fast the manuscript is taken from before his eyes and camera when he makes his revelation.  Listen to his nervous reactions after that, and see how fast he was cut off from C-SPAN after he managed to get the information out.  Then remember that this guy later accompanying President Obama to the Kennedy Space Center on April 15, 2010 where the President mouthed Aldrin's goals, pointing out that we don't have to go back to the moon because Buzz has already been there. 

In President Obama’s speech at the Kennedy Space Center, he made the following claim:

At the same time, after decades of neglect, we will increase investment -- right away -- in other groundbreaking technologies that will allow astronauts to reach space sooner and more often, to travel farther and faster for less cost, and to live and work in space for longer periods of time more safely. That means tackling major scientific and technological challenges. How do we shield astronauts from radiation on longer missions? How do we harness resources on distant worlds? How do we supply spacecraft with energy needed for these far-reaching journeys? These are questions that we can answer and will answer. And these are the questions whose answers no doubt will reap untold benefits right here on Earth.

        What did the President mean?  He gave no specifics.  However there is a very real possibility that he referred to technology that we have long held, but have guarded as one of our closest secrets - perhaps secrets like that involving a craft known as the TR-3B.  However, if we have such technology but it continues to be top secret (or beyond), it does nothing to inspire the youth of today.

       On April 14, 2010, the day before Buzz Aldrin flew off to the Kennedy Space Center with President Obama, lunar commanders Neil Armstrong, James Lovell, and Eugene Cernan issued a letter blasting President Obama's cuts in the U.S. Space Program. The letter, which stood in stark contrast to Aldrin's support of Obama, was as follows:

Neil Armstrong’s letter to President Obama

Times Online

     The United States entered into the challenge of space exploration under President Eisenhower’s first term, however, it was the Soviet Union who excelled in those early years.

     Under the bold vision of Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, and with the overwhelming approval of the American people, we rapidly closed the gap in the final third; of the 20th century, and became the world leader in space exploration.

     America’s space accomplishments earned the respect and admiration of the world. Science probes were unlocking the secrets of the cosmos; space technology was providing instantaneous worldwide communication; orbital sentinels were helping man understand the vagaries of nature.

      Above all else, the people around the world were inspired by the human exploration of space and the expanding of man’s frontier. It suggested that what had been thought to be impossible was now within reach. Students were inspired to prepare themselves to be a part of this new age. No government program in modern history has been so effective in motivating the young to do “what has never been done before.”

       World leadership in space was not achieved easily. In the first half-century of the space age, our country made a significant financial investment, thousands of Americans dedicated themselves to the effort, and some gave their lives to achieve the dream of a nation.

     In the latter part of the first half century of the space age, Americans and their international partners focused primarily on exploiting the near frontiers of space with the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station.

As a result of the tragic loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia in 2003, it was concluded that our space policy required a new strategic vision. Extensive studies and analysis led to this new mandate: meet our existing commitments, return to our exploration roots, return to the moon, and prepare to venture further outward to the asteroids and to Mars.

     The program was named Constellation In the ensuing years, this plan was endorsed by two Presidents of different parties and approved by both Democratic and Republican congresses.

     The Columbia Accident Board had given NASA a number of recommendations fundamental to the Constellation architecture which were duly incorporated. The Ares rocket family was patterned after the Von Braun Modular concept so essential to the success of the Saturn 1B and the Saturn 5.

A number of components in the Ares 1 rocket would become the foundation of the very large heavy lift Ares V, thus reducing the total development costs substantially. After the Ares 1 becomes operational, the only major new components necessary for the Ares V would be the larger propellant tanks to support the heavy lift requirements.

     The design and the production of the flight components and infrastructure to implement this vision was well underway. Detailed planning of all the major sectors of the program had begun. Enthusiasm within NASA and throughout the country was very high.

     When President Obama recently released his budget for NASA, he proposed a slight increase in total funding, substantial research and technology development, an extension of the International Space Station operation until 2020, long range planning for a new but undefined heavy lift rocket and significant funding for the development of commercial access to low earth orbit

Although some of these proposals have merit, the accompanying decision to cancel the Constellation program, its Ares 1 and Ares V rockets, and the Orion spacecraft, is devastating.

     America’s only path to low Earth orbit and the International Space Station will now be subject to an agreement with Russia to purchase space on their Soyuz – at a price of over 50 million dollars per seat with significant increases expected in the near future – until we have the capacity to provide transportation for ourselves.

     The availability of a commercial transport to orbit as envisioned in the President’s proposal cannot be predicted with any certainty, but is likely to take substantially longer and be more expensive than we would hope.

It appears that we will have wasted our current $10-plus billion investment in Constellation and, equally importantly, we will have lost the many years required to recreate the equivalent of what we will have discarded.

     For The United States, the leading space faring nation for nearly half a century, to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future, destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature.

     While the President’s plan envisages humans traveling away from Earth and perhaps toward Mars at some time in the future, the lack of developed rockets and spacecraft will assure that ability will not be available for many years.

     Without the skill and experience that actual spacecraft operation provides, the USA is far too likely to be on a long downhill slide to mediocrity. America must decide if it wishes to remain a leader in space. If it does, we should institute a program which will give us the very best chance of achieving that goal.

Neil Armstrong

Commander, Apollo 11

James Lovell

Commander, Apollo 13

Eugene Cernan

Commander, Apollo 17

    Earlier when I discussed what was really going on the at the Kennedy Space Center as President Obama handed the pink slip to thousands of workers, I offered the possibility that he was setting the stage for his 2012 reelection bid. The hope was that before Obama could announce that we have extraordinary technology, he must first announce that he had decided to build it.  Then, when it fits his political needs at the most opportune time, he could order the craft to appear, as happened before when the Stealth F-117A fighter was announced to the world after 10 years of secret operations. Along these lines, not long ago it was announced that a private company, SpaceX, was developing a heavy lift booster for delivery to Vandenberg Air Force Base. Mars Society President and founder, Dr. Robert Zubrin, sent a gleeful e-mail to all members that we might be able to reach Mars in 10 years. But it appears that he too is slowly catching on. Whatever SpaceX is building, they are a private company that has no requirement to tell the public about contracts they acquire (from our Government or anyone else). In fact, for all we know, the true purpose of the SpaceX mission could be to deliver a weapon to an inbound asteroid, or to a military target at Mars or Phobos. The SpaceX booster will be a prime topic at the upcoming Mars Society convention in Dallas.

     Note: I will update this article with respect to the booster when I return from the Convention. However, the launch site of the first mission is a bit unusual in that, with the exception of polar orbital satellites, it is usually preferable to launch toward the east from a location like Cape Canaveral.  That way if the rocket crashes, it come down over the ocean. Polar launches from Vandenberg go south, but miss land as the U.S. West Coast to the south of Vandenberg curves to the east. Satellite launches to the east are easier (and cheaper in terms of fuel) to accomplish than those to the west because of Earth's counter-clockwise spin. This allows them to capitalize on the angular momentum from the Earth's rotation. A rocket sitting still at Cape Canaveral is already going east at about 800 miles per hour. 

       While Buzz Aldrin hopes for inspiration of our youth, perhaps what he really needs to understand is Obama's interest in robot astronauts and robot space shuttles like the XR-37B. You see, unlike Buzz, robots can be totally controlled.  They have no emotions, no need to tell the truth on C-SPAN. If they are all that we permit to go to Mars, they can be depended on to tell us that the sky is red, even if it's blue.  They have no reason to challenge long held robot-measured pressures on Mars.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SECOND MATRIX. A transliteration for BUZZ ALDRIN has two a-priori terms share the first letter of his name in a 55-letter matrix. The first is OBAMA and the second is MOON. Aldrin was, of course, the second man to walk there. OBAMA is shown with his most common Hebrew spelling. If the axis term were at its lowest ELS, there would be only 1 chance in 222 to have his name so close to the astronaut, but BUZZ ALDRIN is only at its third lowest ELS. A 4-letter word for MOON (pronounced lavanah) seemed to be significant, but I would have been just as happy to see a 3-letter word for moon (pronounced yarayach) there, so I checked for the frequency of both terms in accordance with the Roffman skip formula. As such, the odds against a matrix this good were judged to be about 330 to 1 (p value = ~0.003). The matrix is significant, which is more than I can say for Obama’s promises about Mars.

How Do We Fight the Battle for Truth?  You can get some idea of what we’re up against in my Commentary About Dr. Brandenburg’s Two Mars Books on my page entitled MARS BASE. There are several points, however, that need to be made clear:

1. The people who cover up the truth are the same people who call the shots in terms of career intimidation, and at times, even threats to the lives of folks who want us know the the truth. I could talk about threats made to me and at least one of my sons.  But it's better to hear the words of lunar astronaut Edgar Mitchell. (Note: On Saturday night, July 2, 2011, I noticed that the link that I had originally posted at http://nowthatsweird.co.uk/404.htm for his radio interview read as follows: This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated. I then wrote about this being evidence of intimidation.  By Sunday morning, July 3, 2011 it was back up at again at http://nowthatsweird.co.uk/404.htm. The critical part of the interview after he reveals that aliens have visited us starts at about 7:26 when he was asked about retaliation for his disclosure. He says that used to be a concern by people on the inside, but then at 7:37 he states, "I don't think they're knocking off anybody for that anymore." When I tried to use this link again, I received a message that, "The page isn't redirecting properly. Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.  This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to accept cookies." I was able to re-access the interview again on Internet Explorer at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhNdxdveK7c.

2. What would be most helpful would be a conference where all or a majority of surviving Apollo astronauts gave us the truth at one time. Of course, a search of the Internet reveals multiple disclosures by Aldrin, but the questions about his mental status are always out there even though all of the Apollo 11 reported a UFO on their way to the moon. I wish I could release what I have about James Irwin (of Apollo 15) encountering UFOs on the moon, but the necessary permits have to be cleared from my source and he has concerns about the safety and privacy of Irwin's surviving family.

3.  It doesn't matter how many nations disclose the presence of UFOs so long as the United States does not. The Russians tried to do so with respect to a UFO seen at Phobos. The video was easy to debunk. The cover up will remain in place until the powers that control the U.S. Government decide it's time to let the truth out. Until then, all we'll get is bits and pieces of truth mixed with disinformation.

4. It is crucial to fight this battle by taking the scientific high ground.  This means addressing NASA/JPL errors (deliberate or otherwise) in scientific conferences and publications, where unfortunately, UFOs are a taboo topic, as are photos that seem to indicate structures of artificial origin on Mars (and the moon).  For my family, this means taking on the issue of Martian air pressure despite threats received about my son's future career. Note that I refer to him here as my son.  Why don't I often use his name? Because search engines will tie his name in with what I write. So, in general, we keep the "sensational" material on my Ark Code site, and put the battle-ready scientific findings on his site which you can access via Hot Mars Info. 

THE NEED TO DISTINGUISH SEEING THE FOREST THROUGH THE TREES VS. SEEING THE FOREST THROUGH THE DUST. An example of what may be truth mixed with disinformation is found on a site about trees, structures and UFOs on Mars (http://unclegadget.com/Gallery/space/mars5.html). A better link on this topic is found at http://mmmgroup.altervista.org/e-trees.html. The photo above (Figure 6) of alleged trees seen on Mars is of immediate concern. On June 13, 2011, a PhD in physics sent the picture (and some others) to my son. We looked it over and wrote the following back to him along with the numbers and letters added to his tree photo:

Please look at the objects assigned red numbers and letters. The number corresponds to a suspect tree (1, 2, 3 and 4). The letter S after each number corresponds to what might be a shadow. Objects 1 and 2 look like almost the same size, but the "shadow" for 1 looks a good bit longer than for 2. Object 3 is a lot smaller than object 1, but its "shadow" is about the same size. Object 4 is bigger than 3, but its shadow is comparable or smaller. What does this mean?  The shadow lengths should be in the same ratio as the object sizes if they are shadows. However, what we may be seeing here are dust remains that generally point in the same direction due to the prevailing winds. Also, each "tree" rather resembles a flame, with a bright area up top and to the right. These bright areas might also be due to to dust.  How can both be true, that the dust appears light and dark?  If the wind scoops the dust out of a depression, it would catch the sun's rays more when lifted (thus appearing light) and then the dust would appear dark when it reaches the ground again. This is where color becomes important. We lose a lot in black and white.

On the above set of photos, frames 4 and 5 are supposedly from Opportunity, taken on December 19, 2004 (http://mmmgroup.altervista.org/e-trees.html). Opportunity landed on Mars on January 25, 2004. December 19, 2004 would be in the Martian summer in the northern hemisphere (Month 5, sol 281) when Mars was at Ls 131.1. However, Opportunity's latitude was 1.95 degrees South, so it was technically winter there (although the site is not far from the equator, so this is not a particularly cold place to be). See the calendar at http://www-mars.lmd.jussieu.fr/mars/time/martian_time.html. Frames 4 and 5 are bit deceiving to the eyes.  If they were taken from orbit, they would appear to show a lake. But Opportunity was a rover.  On December 19, 2004, it was clearly on the ground.  Therefore the clear patches shown cannot be a lake.  At best they are a tiny bit of standing water (a few inches across). Frame 3 has no clear source associated with it. Therefore, no conclusion can be reached about what is portrayed. Frame 2 is a famous picture of a frozen lake on Mars. Here the question is about how it fomed.  Was it standing water before it froze, or was there something like an asteroid strike that produced enough heat to temporarily melt ice to fill the crater before the water refroze?

      Finally, another photo at http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m08046/m0804688.html has been interpreted as trees (with a diameter of 1 kilometer). However, the concern here is the latitude - 82.02 South. While we are talking about potential alien life forms here, the photo just referred to would be one of the coldest places on Mars. As such, it is most likely associated with a geological process.  

CUTTING THROUGH THE BUNK. There appears to be a deliberate effort made by a number of people with access to Mars photos to portray items that pertain to life or standing water that can be debunked with relative ease. It is not unreasonable to think that the same authorities that hide the truth about the Roswell UFO are also out there sowing disinformation about Mars that makes it easy to debunk claims about life there. As such, again, each claim must be examined based on its own merits. Our Government has a long history of trying to get people to throw the baby (UFOs) out with the bathwater (weather balloons). This process appears to be at work with respect to Mars. And at the focus of this attempt today, sadly, is the same guy that's killing America's space program, President Obama. On April 30, 2011, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner, Obama mocked Donald Trump for bringing up the issue of which country Obama was born in. What was scary was that in describing Trump's legitimate concern, Obama linked it with the Roswell UFO. The specific joke made at 10:10 into the video was as follows:

“Donald Trump is here tonight. And I know that he’s taken some flak lately. But no one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than ‘The Donald’. And that’s because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter. Like, did we fake the moon landing? What really happened in Roswell?"

There remains reason to believe that Obama's birth certificate was photo-shopped. Even Obama's grandmother says she was in the delivery room with Obama when he was born in Kenya. Obama linking his birth with the Roswell UFO, which generals (like General Thomas Dubose - see video) and astronauts have said was real, appears his way to be mocking Americans for having been fooled so easily. So what can we do? Those with the talent to do so must  take on each part of the puzzle one piece at a time. In this family that piece is Martian air pressure. We know that the Mars Society has a standing policy to prohibit UFO talk, but they do allow presentations about science fiction at their conventions. They need to rethink their priorities, but ensure that anything UFO-related gets the scrutiny that I showed in this article about some of the Mars photos out there. We will never get to the truth by promoting blanket censorship of these issues. In the end, there may be justifiable reason to keep the truth from the public (like  Dr. Brandenburg's nuclear explosions on Mars and the fear this knowledge may cause). But in the end, if there are aliens out there running around with nukes, and deals are being cut between our Government and them, we have a right to know the cost of those deals.