THE SCIENTIFIC HUNT IS ON FOR A MIRROR UNIVERSE

       On June 30, 2019 Corey S Powell wrote that, "At Oak Ridge National Laboratory ... physicist Leah Broussard is trying to open a portal to a parallel universe. She calls it an “oscillation” that would lead her to “mirror matter,” but the idea is fundamentally the same. In a series of experiments she plans to run at Oak Ridge this summer, Broussard will send a beam of subatomic particles down a 50-foot tunnel, past a powerful magnet and into an impenetrable wall. If the setup is just right — and if the universe cooperates — some of those particles will transform into mirror-image versions of themselves, allowing them to tunnel right through the wall. And if that happens, Broussard will have uncovered the first evidence of a mirror world right alongside our own.

       This article will be based on the L. J. Broussard et al. paper at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.00767.pdf. The axis term on Figure 1 is MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE. At the same absolute skip (55,715) are NEUTRON, MATTER , TEMPERATURE (overlapping MATTER), SPOT (sharing a letter qof with COLD at skip +1) and REVERSAL. TIME is at skip -55,716. ZERO is at skip +1.

JUST WHAT IS BEING CLAIMED BY THE BROUSSARD ET AL. ARTICLE? This depends upon who you ask and upon their understanding of a very complex subject. The paper in question, NEW SEARCH FOR MIRROR NEUTRONS AT HFIR, will require anyone without a Ph.D. in particle physics with issues to study or resolve. Note: HFIR is the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

       For the first time in 22 years of Torah Codes research, I will claim that the answer to a major scientific question, in this case the issue of mirror world reality, is already given to us through encoding in the Torah. It only takes 28 letters to read MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE, SPOT in sequence with it and COLD springing from it. There are several highly significant supporting terms surrounding the major point. What is the major point? That the best, but not only, evidence for a mirror universe comes from a cold spot that is missing about 10,000 galaxies. The working assumption here is that at some point (as with Figure 1) enough is encoded to make it mathematically almost impossible to have so much useful a priori information appear at an ELS in a small area by chance. What's left is an encoded statement by God or a future artificial intelligence (controlled by humans or aliens) with the motivation to transmit this vital bit of (hopefully accurate) knowledge to us. In the discussions below text lifted from the press will be shown in dark blue fonts. In addition to what was originally presented by Corey S Powell, I will also quote Sean Martin, Broussard et al. and others this way. My response will be in black fonts.

TERMINOLOGY - PARALLEL WORLD/UNIVERSE vs. MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE.

       My first observation is that the main article by Broussard et al. (2017) only uses the term parallel world in the references but never in the main body of the text (parallel universe is not used at all). The one reference to parallel world is for a 2012 paper by Z. Berezhiani and F. Nesti entitled Magnetic anomaly in UCN trapping: signal for neutron oscillations to parallel world? In contrast to that, the article by Sean Martin is entitled Parallel Universe Breakthrough: Scientists begin work on finding a "mirrorverse." 

       Martin's are has the more eye-catching title, but after discussing the fact that the cold spot has 20 less matter than expected, it asserts that  astronomers believe they may now have the solution and theorize that:

"The area could be where one universe is encroaching on another. Experts from Durham University said in a paper that as a parallel universe crashed into ours, much of the galaxies and matter were shoved away from the cold spot. The team adds that if our universe came to be from seemingly nothing and embarked on what looks like an infinite expansion, then others could have too."

       Martin has nothing else to add on the subject. His article is only in a UK tabloid, the Express so we're better of sticking with the original Broussard et al. article although it is not always clear (a set of definitions would help it a lot).

       With respect to parallel universes, consider Schrödinger's Cat shown below on Figure 2. Schrödinger proposed a scenario with a cat in a locked steel chamber, wherein the cat's life or death depended on the state of a radioactive atom, whether it had decayed and emitted radiation or not. According to Schrödinger, the Copenhagen interpretation implies that the cat remains both alive and dead until the state has been observed. It is important to understand that Schrödinger did not wish to promote the idea of dead-and-alive cats as a serious possibility; on the contrary, he intended the example to illustrate the absurdity of the existing view of quantum mechanics (Schrödinger, Erwin (November 1935). "Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics)". Therefore, although Schrödinger's name is often with parallel universes (in this case a universe where the cat is alive and another in which it is dead), Schrödinger may be the wrong person to turn to here.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1.  Again, as per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, which is MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE at its lowest skip in unwrapped Torah. What terms on Figure 1 back the message in the 28 letters highlighted above? NEUTRON, MATTER, TEMPERATURE (overlapping MATTER), REVERSAL, and TIME.

       NEUTRONs are important because they are mentioned in the title of the paper NEW SEARCH FOR MIRROR NEUTRONS AT HFIR. I sought 7 spellings for NEUTRON and found one of them at a special case skip (that of the axis term) against odds of about 237 to 1 on the smaller matrix (white background) shown on Figure 1. In this same 644-letter area we also have MATTER. The abstract of the Broussard et al. article states:

The theory of mirror MATTER predicts a hidden sector made up of a copy of the Standard Model particles and interactions but with opposite parity. If mirror matter interacts with ordinary matter, there could be experimentally accessible implications in the form of neutral particle oscillations.

       The article also points out that:

A strong foundation of evidence has been built over the past several decades which indicates that 85% of the matter in the universe is unknown to us [1]. The evidence for Dark Matter comes from many diverse astronomical sources including rotational curves of galaxies, weak and strong lensing, galaxy collisions such as the Bullet Cluster, and the cosmic microwave background; however, to date it is based solely on astrophysical signatures of its gravitational influence.

      MATTER is also at the skip of MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE, again at a special case skip against odds of about 47.8 to 1. TEMPERATURE shares 3 out of 4 letters with MATTER. If I knew that before searching for it I wouldn't have included it in the odds, but I didn't. Odds against TEMPERATURE being somewhere at a special case skip here were about 2.7 to 1 with no added value for overlapping MATTER. Temperature is important in the paper being discussed because it asserts:

To meet constraints from Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the effective number of light neutrino species, the mirror universe could not be identical in terms of cosmological evolution, and should instead have a lower TEMPERATURE, and therefore be helium dominated.

       COLD vs. ULTRACOLD. The Broussard article discusses use of COLD and ultraCOLD neutrons. How cold is COLD and how cold is ultra COLD]? I found a PowerPoint entitled COLD NEUTRON AND ULTRACOLD NEUTRON SOURCES that listed cold as ~20K. Ultracold was listed as having a temperature less than 4mK (pretty close to absolute zero). Note that the matrix has ZERO at skip +1 on it. How close is <4mK to absolute zero? 4mK equals -459.663 degrees Fahrenheit. Absolute zero is -459.67 degrees Fahrenheit.

The Broussard article states of cold and ultracold neutrons that:

A particular advantage of ultracold neutron experiments is the potentially long storage time of the neutrons, enabling a relatively compact experiment in which each slow-moving neutron undergoes many thousands of “bounces” which can sample the oscillation probability. Alternatively, cold neutrons are produced with fluxes of many orders of magnitude higher than ultra-cold neutron sources. Therefore, cold neutrons offer an attractive opportunity search not only for an anomalous disappearance, but also the regeneration of neutrons from the mirror state.

       On the spreadsheet to calculate odds for Figure 1 I show one calculation for a 3-letter word for COLD that at skip -2 touches MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE. It had an 81% chance to be somewhere on the matrix, but the 2-letter word is more widely used. As a rule, I don't include 2-letter on my spreadsheets, but this word for COLD is of interest because it shares a letter qof with SPOT. COLD SPOT is of interest because it is what some scientists point to as evidence for a mirror universe. Further SPOT is at the skip of (and in sequence with) MIRROR WORLD/UNIVERSE. Odds against SPOT being at special case skip were about 473 to 1. Only the letter qof in SPOT offered the possibility of starting the 2-letter word for COLD. The letter resh was needed next to finish it. Of the 304,805 letters of Torah, there are 18,125 reshes. So that's about 5.946%. So odds against having this cold were about 16.81 to 1 - but I avoided the topic of it on the spreadsheet.    

       Two terms on the matrix are TIME and REVERSAL.   They were sought because the Broussard article states:

Mirror matter manifests as a perfect copy of Standard Model particles and interactions such that parity and TIME  REVERSAL are exact symmetries, and interacts very weakly with our known universe, primarily gravitationally.

       REVERSAL had only about 1 chance in 8.67 to be found on the matrix at a special case skip (here the absolute skip of the axis term) but TIME had about a 65% chance to be found (it was not at a special case skip).

       I sought the word FIELD because of magnetic fields discussed in the Broussard article. It was on the full matrix in the open text against odds of about 3.82 to 1, but it was cut from the top (primary) spreadsheet calculation because it added no more overall value to the matrix - requiring an expansion from 644 to 840 letters to include it. Overall, the 644-letter matrix was found against odds of about 13,407,348,882 to 1. This makes it one of the strongest matrices that I have ever seen in my 22 years of Torah Codes research. That it specifically addreses the exact nature of the universe is of the greatest interest. It is telling us exactly where to focus our scientific energy.

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF COREY POWELL’S DESCRIPTION OF THE EXPERIMENT. Because Powell's description has been watered down I will attempt to clarify some items with sections taken directly from Broussard et al.  The source for each section below is given first. See Figure 3 to understand the experiment further.

1. [Powell] In the disappearance search Broussard will send a beam flux of cold neutrons down a fifty foot tunnel past a powerful magnet.

2. [Broussard] A magnetic field control system provides a uniform magnetic field over some length of the beam line which can be “tuned” to match the unknown mirror magnetic field and achieve the resonance for the neutron oscillation probability.

3. [Powell] After the magnet the beam hits an impenetrable wall. If the setup is just right — and if the universe cooperates — some of those particles will transform into mirror-image versions of themselves, allowing them to tunnel right through the wall.

4. [Broussard] A signal for disappearance into a mirror neutron state is given by a reduction in the flux for a particular magnitude of the magnetic field. The neutron flux can be monitored upstream of the oscillation section by a low efficiency neutron counter.

5. [Broussard] For a regeneration search, the neutron counter at the first stage beam line exit is backed by a beam stop to significantly attenuate the number of neutrons that can enter the second stage of the experiment. Only mirror neutrons, whose interactions with ordinary matter are negligible, can pass through unhindered. The second stage consists of a larger diameter vacuum vessel with similar requirements for magnetic field control to enable the oscillation of mirror neutrons back into ordinary neutrons. A low background, large area detector at the end of the second stage detects the regenerated neutrons.

What is meant by disappearance of neutrons? Natalie Wolchover at Quantamagazine writes:

When physicists strip neutrons from atomic nuclei, put them in a bottle, then count how many remain there after some time, they infer that neutrons radioactively decay in 14 minutes and 39 seconds, on average. But when other physicists generate beams of neutrons and tally the emerging protons — the particles that free neutrons decay into — they peg the average neutron lifetime at around 14 minutes and 48 seconds.

The Powel article mentions differences of 14 minutes 38 seconds (vs. 39 seconds) and 14 minutes 48 seconds. But it also states that

Ten seconds might not sound like much, but the actual difference should be zero: All neutrons are exactly the same, and their behavior should depend not one bit on where or how they are examined.

“I take discrepancy very seriously,” says Benjamin Grinstein, a particle-physics expert at the University of California, San Diego. “It’s not just between two experiments. It is a collection of many experiments done independently by several groups. The newest experiments, conceived in part to resolve the disagreement, have “only made it worse,” he adds."

Here's where we get into the speculation about a mirror world. The Powell article states:

"Grinstein has explored the possibility that some neutrons are unexpectedly breaking down into particles other than protons but has found nothing so far. Mirror matter offers a more elegant, if somewhat bizarre, explanation.

A decade ago, Anatoli Serebrov of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute in Russia introduced the idea that ordinary neutrons sometimes cross over into the mirror world and transform into mirror neutrons. At that point, we could no longer detect them — it would be as if some of the neutrons simply vanished. “That would make the neutron lifetime look wrong,” Broussard explains, because some of the neutrons would have been disappearing from the test equipment while the researchers were studying them. Connect the dots, and you reach a far-out conclusion: The neutron experiments might look screwy because physicists unwittingly opened a portal to the mirror world."

      Proving that a mirror world has been found in possible by the end of the summer this year (2019).  There are two separate tracks currently underway, Brousaard's and that of Klaus Kirch at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Zurich.

       Broussard is looking for any telltale neutrons that get past the barrier by turning into mirror neutrons, then turn back. She says that, “We should see no neutrons” according to conventional physics theory. If some of them show up anyway, that would suggest that conventional physics is wrong, and the mirror world is real."

       Meanwhile Kirch plans to capture slow-moving neutrons, hit them with a magnetic field and then count to see if all the particles are still there. “If some neutrons oscillated into mirror-neutrons, they would disappear from our apparatus,” he says.

FIGURE 4 AND DARK MATTER. Broussard et al. write that:

The possibility of mirror matter as a type of hidden sector dark matter candidate has been considered for decades. Mirrormatter manifests as a perfect copy of Standard Model particles and interactions such that parity and time reversal are exact symmetries, and interactsvery weakly with our known universe, primarily gravitationally. It is a type of asymmetric, self-interacting, baryonic dark matter.

       Note: baryonic matter should include protons, neutrons and all the objects composed of them (i.e. atomic nuclei), but exclude things such as electrons and neutrinos which are actually leptons. Reference numbers here have been deleted but can be obtained from Section 1 of the paper. Broussard continues:

To meet constraints from Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the effective number of light neutrino species, the mirror universe could not be identical in terms of cosmological evolution, and should instead have a lower temperature, and therefore be helium dominated, with a larger baryon asymmetry. Like ordinary matter, mirror matter should dissipate energy at too high a rate for halos to form; the formation of disk galaxies may be avoided by a more rapid stellar evolution, or the energy dissipation rate may be compensated via an energy injection from supernovae due to kinetic mixing between the two sectors.

       Figure 4 above is based on DARK MATTER as an axis term. I originally sought this term because I wasn't seeing a lot of encouragement about experimental efforts to find tachyons, but as was discussed above we're still unsure about what dark matter is and how it fits in with understanding our universe or the multiverse. When I can't solve a problem by using in the box methods, I think out of the box. The normal box is one of our universe being based on atoms and molecules plus other particles and energy. But in the real universe relying on matter alone to find what could generate tachyons is like reading a book when a book when you can only read about 1 word in 21. Only 4.6% to 4.9% of our universe is made of atoms. Currently 23% to 26.8% of our universe is dark matter, and supposedly 13.7 billion years ago that figure was around 63%. 

      Exactly what is dark matter? We don't know. Maybe its mirror matter.  Dark energy forms another 72% of our universe today, but at least one source indicates that it wasn't around 13.7 billion years ago. We'll return to what research indicates about dark matter and dark energy later. There are 51 ELSs of dark energy in wrapped Torah but so far I have only investigated DARK MATTER. The ELS shown in Figure 4 (top and bottom) is based on the 75th lowest skip of DARK MATTER. It took me a while to find it because I was insisting on the presence of both WORMHOLE and TACHYON at special case skips. I succeeded in find both on the top matrix in Figure 4. The bottom matrix on Figure 4 shows what happens if we shift our attention to the right of the axis term rather to the left as was done in the top matrix. This results in us seeing TO THE PAST at the same absolute skip as DARK MATTER. TO THE PAST shares a letter ayin with UNIVERSE/WORLD/FOREVER at skip +1. On both top and bottom matrices for Figure 4 WORMHOLE crosses DARK MATTER, sharing a letter vav with it in a 35-letter box.

       I decided to use snooping, which is not an a priori technique that allows me to calculate a probability. In doing so  found something that correlates well to current scientific beliefs. In direct sequence with DARK MATTER is TO BE KILLED. Thus we have a 13-letter ELS that say DARK MATTER is TO BE KILLED. It is crossed by WORMHOLE and TACHYON is on the matrix. Since dark matter has died off from about 63% down to about 23% of the matter in the universe the question is what is killing it? And what does it turn into when it's dead? From looking at the charts on the matrix it appears that a lot of it becomes dark energy, which we don't exactly understand, but recent research by A. E. Allahverdyan and V. G. Gurzadyan (Phys. Rev. E 93, 052125 – Published 13 May 2016) suggests that dark energy may cause the arrow of time to move forward. However, note that atoms have also decreased from 12% of the mass of the universe down to about 4.6%. There's lots of room here for tachyons to be created, but were they?

       For now let it be said that the 9-letter axis term TACHYON TO THE PAST produced much more statistically significant results in conjunction with WORMHOLE. This doesn't mean that dark matter or dark energy isn't involved. The top matrix on Figure 4 suggests what could be a very productive line of research. Still, for now, we are looking for how signals were sent back in time for the Torah. Yes, it could be that God exists outside of time (which He created), but that doesn't explain exactly what happened in my meeting at the Cape Canaveral library on August 1, 2016. As such, I will continue to focus both on our DoD R&D folks, and on God as He is revealed through the Torah. Based on DoD's nearly nonstop presence here I am convinced that they have many of the answers I'm looking for, or feel that I will find them and publish them here. The latter possiibility would explain why they put up with me.

EVIDENCE FOR PARALLEL WORLDS FROM THE SINGLE SLIT EXPERIMENT.

       In looking at the question parallel world existence, Howard Wiseman, Director of the Centre of Quantum Dynamics at Griffith University, theorizes that no new universes are ever created. Instead many worlds have existed, side-by-side, since the beginning of time. On some follow the dinosaur-killing asteroid never hit says Wiseman. Others are almost identical to our own. It’s the interaction of these nearby worlds that gives rise to quantum effects, the theory says. But where’s the evidence?

         So what’s led Wiseman to stir yet another seriously weird theory into the mix? Wiseman refers to “two-slit” experiment for electrons. It’s a version of the famous two-slit experiment first performed by Thomas Young in the 1800s with light. He found that a light beam passing through two closely spaced slits in a screen onto a wall behind did not, as one might expect, produce an image of two lines. Instead it formed an interference pattern rather like the overlapping wakes of two boats, leading Young to deduce that light is a type of wave.

       In the early 20th century Niels Bohr and others began to find evidence that fundamental particles, like electrons, also had wave-like properties. The proof came in 1961 when the two-slit experiment was performed with electrons and a wave-like interference pattern, just like that of light, was found.

       Even stranger, responding to a suggestion by Richard Feynman, in 1974 Giulio Pozzi and colleagues at the University of Bologna showed you still get an interference pattern when you fire one electron at a time – as if each individual electron passes through both slits and interferes with itself. See the bottom of Figure 5 above.

       Niels Bohr’s quantum theory managed to predict the behaviors using math known as the “wave function” to pictures the electron neither as a particle nor a wave, but as a fuzzy “cloud of probability”.

       Einstein abhorred how quantum theory turned the electron from a particle into a cloud. He, like Newton, imagined a universe that ran like clockwork. “God does not play dice,” said Einstein. “I think Einstein should stop telling God what to do,” responded Bohr.

       The new theory proposed by the Griffith University team is a lot closer to Einstein’s vision than Bohr’s. Probability clouds along with the other conundrums of wave-particle duality are gone. Electrons being fired at the slits are particles after all. In our world the electron might pass through the bottom slit. But in a parallel world the electron passes through the top slit. As the two ghostly twins travel towards the detectors (one in our world, one in a parallel world), their paths could overlap. But according to the theory, a newly proposed repulsive force stops the electrons coming too close to one another. In effect, the electron in our world “collides” with its ghostly twin, like billiard balls knocking together as they roll across a pool table.

       Wiseman asserts this interaction between parallel worlds leads to just the type of interference patterns observed – implying electrons are not waves after all. They have supported their theory by running computer simulations of the two-slit experiment using up to 41 interacting worlds. “It certainly captured the essential features of peaks and troughs in the right places,” says Wiseman.

       If the number of worlds is finite – as modelled in the team’s computer simulations – rather than infinite, then the predictions made by the new theory will deviate from standard quantum theory. Though the deviations are likely to be only slight they could be testable in the lab using experiments similar to the double slit. Tantalizingly, as the size of the deviations depends on the number of parallel worlds, these experiments could provide an effective measure of how many worlds are out there.

       But… parallel worlds? Is this not all too absurd to take seriously? Not for the physicists, it seems. And as David Wallace points out in The Emergent Multiverse, our sense of absurdity evolved to help us scratch a living on the savannahs of Africa. “The Universe is not obliged to conform to it.”

       The discussion above is based on an article that appeared in Cosmos 61 - Feb-Mar 2015 under the headline "Can we test for parallel worlds?"

DISCUSSION OF PARALLEL UNIVERSES, FREE WILL AND THE AUTHOR OF THE TORAH CODE.

       Recently my family enjoyed the movie YESTERDAY. In it a mediocre song writer (Jack Malik) suddenly finds himself in a parallel universe in which he still has the same girlfriend, but there never were any musicians known as the Beatles. Jack, however, knows all the works of the Beatles, and he soon becomes the hottest musician in the world. Normally when people talk about parallel words they imagine worlds in which they marry someone else, or where a loved one did or did not die in a car wreck. In Jack Malik's new world there is no Coca Cola, but there is Pepsi. In Powell's article he quotes Broussard as saying:

"The mirror world, assuming it exists, would have its own laws of mirror-physics and its own mirror-history. You wouldn’t find a mirror version of yourself there (and no evil Spock with a goatee — sorry "Star Trek" fans). But current theory allows that you might find mirror atoms and mirror rocks, maybe even mirror planets and stars. Collectively, they could form an entire shadow world, just as real as our own but almost completely cut off from us."

       Of course, unless Broussard has been to a mirror world she can only speculate. If she finds mirror neutrons what might that mean? Wikipedia states, "Mirror particles interact amongst themselves in the same way as ordinary particles, except where ordinary particles have left-handed interactions, mirror particles have right-handed interactions. In this way, it turns out that mirror reflection symmetry can exist as an exact symmetry of nature, provided that a "mirror" particle exists for every ordinary particle." Possibly this means that the right handed rule relating direction of current flow to magnetic fields would be reversed. Clarification is needed here.

       Most people would (I admit) reasonably argue that all I can do is speculate too. But, while my higher math skills are likely not as good as Broussard’s math abilities are, I am increasingly able to break the Torah Code and statistically analyze what has been found. What I see is consistent with Deuteronomy 30:19:

¹⁹ This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live.

       Just as the open text of the Torah allows for free will, so does the encoded Torah Code. And the Torah Code, to the tune of odds of over 13 billion to 1, is letting us know that there are alternate worlds. Most of my readers appear to be military intelligence folks. So let me pause here to give them the good news and the bad news. First the bad news - if free will results in more than one universe and more than one outcome of issues like whether we will go to nuclear war with Iran, then we have what looks like an easy cop out when we get a prediction wrong. The good news is that the more heavily and consistently an outcome is encoded the more likely we are to get it right. The Intelligence officer who uses the Torah Code to augment other data inputs must not only search for  what our concerns are, but where multiple outcomes or universes seem to be encoded, there needs to be an effort made to figure out which universe most closely matches the one that we live in. This means that there must be quality control when it comes to a priori key word selection for each experiment. Yes, you can take this as another plug for Project Creator Decoder. You get what you pay for. Even if you like what I put out for free, I'm 72 and unless the Messiah arrives soon, I don't expect to be in this universe (at least on the part of our timeline that is current) forever.

       Before pressing on let me state the obvious. The Code exists. Traditionally, God is the Author. But there is the possibility of a future AI composing it and somehow transmitting it back thousands of years in time. If Broussard and others manage to prove the existence of other universes what happens to time in the transition zone between one universe and the next? Does the arrow of time remain constant in a mirror world or is it possible that it reverses? The question here is not merely academic. It is real, and directed to my friend Joseph and his Fort Huachuca buddies. I discuss that in my article IS GOD FROM THE FUTURE AND DOES HE SEND SIGNALS BACK IN TIME? The Fort has checked this article many times every day since I began to write on it on July 5, 2019.

       Let's focus again on new experiments looking for parallel or mirror worlds/multiverses. As noted above, there are differences in how to describe such places both in terms of what to call them and what they are like. As for God, what I am to say as a Modern Orthodox Jew? Who is God, assuming that He exists? Arthur C. Clarke wrote that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Michael Sherman’s variant of that is that any sufficiently advanced extraterrestrial intelligence is indistinguishable from God.

       So Who is God? Genesis 1:1 is my answer. If Someone created the heavens and the Earth, He is my God. But if he or it didn't do that, but wrote the Torah in the future in some military lab and sent it back in time then he or it is just a hell of a great intellect or machine, but no god. Moreover, the Author, God or Supercomputer, has given us texts that are not clear and often have served as cause for war. We need clarification and (loving) attention. If God lost His patience (even metaphorically) enough to destroy the world after only ten generations, how much more have we displeased Him since? On the other hand, while I write voluntarily to find actionable intelligence information to aid our military, I am, based on the meeting with Joseph, concerned that even if God is the Author of the Torah Code, misguided intelligence personnel such as those who tried to bring down President Trump could greatly misuse the Code. As with all technology, knowledge of how to use the Code can benefit or seriously harm us. Indeed maybe it will do both, and in doing so, generate more parallel worlds.

Note to DoD and UK MOD: There was possible Iranian access to this article from IP 2.178.45.15 starting at 09/Jul/2019:11:12:52 MST7MDT and extending up through at least 09/Jul/2019:11:17:24 MST7MDT. This IP only results after dropping a 6 at the start of the IP address.

To my other readers: I do not keep records of all readers. I assume that most DoD and UK MOD readers are friendly, but initial encounter with an agent from Fort Huachucha on August 1, 2016 included a threat by him to launch a personal attack against me. While the encounter ended on a friendly note I remain on alert as to what they are up to. The Fort is my top reader. It has been on this site reading what I offer many times every day for over four years. On the assumption that they have largely friendly (and sometimes obviously friendly) motives when I find someone with a questionable agenda with an IP from Iran, Russia, or China I put out a warning to our Defense Department (DoD) to check out the reader. I would do the same with North Korea, but any readers that come here from there go through South Korean IP addresses. I am unable to determine if they are hostile or not.

Note to Iran: If IP address  2.178.45.15 is you, know this. You are leading this world toward a nuclear war. Based on what was leaned above it's probably correct to assert that in some parallel universes you actually cause it, but in other universes you either get smart or your government is overthrown by your people before you can destroy the world and them with it. In analyzing your actions remember that you may be attacked by the U.S. or Israel. Neither nation wants to destroy you but your fanatical leaders are leaving both with little choice. Remember the words of Deuteronomy 30:19:

This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live.