JOHN PODESTA, OBAMA, BUZZ ALDRIN AND UFO DISCLOSURE

This article discusses the significance of John Podesta saying that that “Finally, my biggest failure of 2014: Once again not securing the #disclosure of the UFO files. #thetruthisstilloutthere.” He tweeted this February 13, 2015, his last day in the White House. In 2002 Podesta discussed the importance of UFO disclosure at a conference organized by the Coalition for Freedom of Information. “I think it’s time to open the book on questions that have remained in the dark, on the question of government investigations of UFOs,” he said. “We ought to do it, really, because it’s right, we ought to do it because the American people, quite frankly, can handle the truth, and we ought to do it because it’s a law.”

       On Figure 1 the axis term is PODESTA. OBAMA is at the same skip. So is UFO. REGRET is at skip +1, touching UFO. The word ALIEN is at skip +1 (the open text). If Podesta has regrets about no formal disclosure about UFOs during his time as Chief of Staff for President Clinton, and his time as advisor for Obama, he is likely to find the same problem in working now for Hillary Clinton. If Podesta wants to learn about UFOs he might do better by going to work for the Bush family. BUSH is at skip +1 on Figure 1. After winning election to President, Carter met with then CIA Director George H. W. Bush seeking a briefing on the topic. Bush turned him down, claiming that neither as President nor as Commander-in-Chief did Carter have a "need to know."

SO FAR ONLY HINTS OF DISCLOSURE AND WISE CRACKS THAT ARE IN FACT LIKELY BASED ON TRUTH.

        On September 20, 2010 NBC launched a new dramatic series, The Event. In it, Blair Underwood in a shallow impersonation of President Obama starred as the Commander-in-Chief who was forced to announce that our planet was being engaged by extraterrestrial intelligence. There was speculation in the UFO community that the show was the latest in a long line of infotainments designed to prepare the way for a real announcement. On December 2, 2010 there was an announcement about exobiology NASA, but it only dealt with bacteria.  I have a matrix up about the announcement at Alien DNA. While bacteria based on DNA with arsenic rather than phosphorus is an astounding find, it's only the smallest of a fraction of what NASA still is keeping from the public.      

       Most disappointing, on the night before the raid that killed Bin Laden, at a White House roast of Obama with Donald Trump present; Obama likened stories of his foreign birth to those of the Roswell UFO. To link his birth with Roswell means that Obama will probably not reveal the truth about Roswell any more than he would risk removal from office by telling us the truth about his birth. His other joke about Roswell is also noteworthy. Sadly, I believe that Obama was indeed born in Mombasa, and I know that the Roswell event was real. I say this because I have known trustworthy people of high rank who have claimed to have seen the Roswell craft in 1964 and in conjunction with what Kennedy Space Center NASA administrators wanted done when UFOs were present during launch operations.

DISCLOSURE CALCULATIONS AND A HINT OF WHERE TO LOOK. 

       When I say that I know that the Roswell events was real, I also know of threats that I have received for revealing details (the most recent threat was in September 2014). 

       If someone writes to me claiming to have been abducted (not uncommon), and they want their story told, I'm often (but not always) happy to do so while also pointing out what was dubious about it. But if they were or are a Government employee who signed a non-disclosure form, then the matter is trickier or even dangerous. The calculation runs something like this: What is the likelihood that the threats would be backed by action, who would be hurt if I repeated exactly what they said, what is their age of the person involved, or are they deceased?  After they depart this life there is a temptation to reveal at least part of what they told me - in some cases "death bed confessions." So let me give you something solid (though filtered) here as an example.

        At the very height of the Cold War in March, 1960 there was an important meeting of scientists from the U.S., its allies, the Soviet Union, and Poland in Tokyo and Osaka, Japan. For cross reference on relations between the U.S. and Russians in March, 1960, realize that the Russians shot down an American U-2 spy plane less than 2 months later on May 1, 1960. They knew about such flights before then (the first flight was on April 9, 1960), but only had the missile required to shoot the plane down in May. Planning for the flights went back to 1957.

        Relations between Japan and the Soviet Union then were far from friendly too. In 1960 the Soviet Government warned Japan against signing the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation with the United States, and after the treaty was signed, the Soviets declared that it wouldn't hand over the Habomai Islands and Shikotan under any circumstances unless Japan abrogated the treaty forthwith.

      Since President Obama hasn't yet made any honest disclosure, I will tell what was and is still unclassified, but what in the light of history may give away the picture of what was really going on back when Eisenhower was President in March, 1960. It's common knowledge that people who claimed to see the Roswell wreckage noted that when the metal was folded or crumbled up, it straightened itself out. There was a lot of testing that was supposedly done on it to find out what it was composed of and why it was so hard to destroy. The scientists who would be most qualified to handle it would have been experts in nondestructive testing. The meeting that I refer to was the Third International Conference of Nondestructive Testing. It was organized by the Science Council of Japan in cooperation with the Japanese Society for Nondestructive Testing. The Soviets who were present were Professor Dr. Mikhael N. Mikheev (Director of the Physics Metal Institute in Moscow); Pavel G. Mikhnevevitch (Engineer, All-Union Material Institute in Moscow), and Dr. Alexander D. Ivanov (Engineer, Radio Research Institute, Leningrad). Poland was a member of the Warsaw Pact (then our enemies). From Poland there was Professor Ignacy Malecki (Director, Institute of Basic Technical Problems, Polish Academy of Sciences). There were many Americans present who came from U.S. military facilities around the nation, but since it is alleged that the Roswell spacecraft was taken to Wright Patterson Air Force Base, I will just point out that Edgar Dugger, a Supervisory Materials Engineer was at the conference to represent the Wright Air Development Division at Wright Pattersonn AFB. Did he speak about the Roswell UFO? I don't know. I wasn't there and I don't know for certain if UFOs were discussed or not, but based on a death bed confession that I heard when the immediate topic beforehand was UFOs, I suspect that the issue was at least brought up, if not the prime motive for the conference. It's only because of the confession that I heard that I am aware of the conference and its attendees. I tried to pin the man down more who revealed these thing to me, but all he would say was, "You're a smart guy - you'll figure it out."

       Normally scientists in nondestructive testing would be taking apart captured enemy equipment with a goal of learning how to defeat it in battle. So the issue here is, who was a common enemy of the U.S. and U.S.S.R. that provided the reason for Americans and Soviets to work together? From 1947 to through 1960 there was an abundance of UFO sightings (I saw one on my 10th birthday described at this link). It scared the hell out of me, and started my life-long push to learn the truth. There can be no doubt that the truth behind UFO reports was (and likely still is) a major defense concern in America, the Soviet Union/Russia, and other advanced nations.

STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRICES. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, which is PODESTA on Figure 1 at its lowest skip in wrapped Torah.  However I found another transliteration of his name (with a letter hey ending) at a lower skip, so I use ELS rank 2 for purposes of the probability calculation. Since the news was about Podesta's UFO REGRET, I looked for UFO and REGRET at special case skips. The result is shown in the 54-letter part of the matrix that is highlighted with a blue background. Before correction for ELS rank 2 of the axis term, UFO was found at a special case skip (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) against odds of about 35 to 1. REGRET was found at the best case scenario - skip +1 - against odds of about 706 to 1. After factoring in the ELS rank of PODESTA, this part of the matrix was found against odds of about 12,402 to 1. On the full 1,184 letter Figure 1 matrix for, the initial odds against UFO at a special case skip drops to about 2 to 1, and  the odds against  REGRET drops to about 32 to 1, but we pick up ALIEN in the open text against odds of about 26 to 1, and OBAMA at a specila case skip against odds of about 86 to 1. BUSH was found at skip +1 against odds of about 8 to 1. Overall, the full matrix was found against odds of about 655,953 to 1. 

       Figure 2 has been up on my site since 2009. My standards are tougher now than then. By today's standards when I publish a matrix with Obama's name on it I like to see Obama at a special case skip. Here Obama's skip is one more than UFO DISCLOSURE, so it slants down and to the left rather than running vertically. The truth about UFOs will not be established by Torah Codes, but please allow me to briefly discuss the math involved here anyway.

       The probability that OBAMA would lie in a 48-letter matrix with UFO DISCLOSURE (at ELS Rank #3 in wrapped Torah) equals about one chance in 192 (note that on the full 352-letter matrix there was about one chance in 13.6 that the name would be there someplace).  However, six years after posting this matrix, there is no sign yet that Obama will do us a favor and finally be honest with something. So, at best, the issue is who (if anyone) will disclose the truth during this president's horrendous rule when NASA's target date for landing people on Mars has been put off until the 2030s. 

     The discovery that NEPHILIM was in the larger, 352-letter matrix, was a posteriori but still of interest. Normally I don't calculate the statistical significance of a posteriori terms; however this web site discusses a Tall Extra Terrestrial in conjunction with the page on Clark McClelland, who claimed to see such a being on a classified monitor being used for a Department of Defense Space Shuttle flight in the early 1990s. A diagram of what he supposedly saw is included on the left below the matrix. Clark has published extensively about his experience at the Kennedy Space Center, and he believes that the creature seen was one of the Nephilim (giants) discussed in the Torah. In 2012 I moved to Cape Canaveral, Florida. Many of the people who live in my condominium complex work at the Space Center, which can easily be seen from my condo. At least one has indirectly confirmed Clark's story. As such, we'll bypass the a posteriori issue for the moment. The odds against NEPHILIM being in the open text so close to UFO DISCLOSURE are about 223 to 1. The text for Nephilim shown on the matrix is from Genesis 6:4. Many writers associate it with aliens who interbred with humans. The text reads:

The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them; the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.  

       The odds against NEPHILIM being in the open text on the 352-letter matrix are about 96 to 1. There is also a transliteration of MARS on the matrix. But Clark's claims (despite any non-disclosure letter that he might have signed) do not constitute serious nondisclosure because he makes many wild, unsubstantiated claims that mis-color his core claim. Most annoying is that he thinks Zionists are to blame for all his personal health and financial woes. In reality his money problems are linked to becoming the poster boy for what happens to those associated with NASA who talk about UFOs (he lost his retirement).

NEPHILIM AND DISCLOSURE. Genesis 6:4 may have a bearing on disclosure it he does imply alien attempts to interbreed with humans. In ancient times people were defenseless against such abuse. But now we are in an age of advanced capabilities. More, if the story of Roswell is right, our Government has aquired at least one craft that we have had plenty of time to back engineer. So if ET wants to acquire human genertic material these days, he may have to cooperate with governments on Earth (in particular the American and Russian Governments). ET may offer technology that can be used for military purposes, or as was argued by Lieutenant Philip Corso in his book, THE DAY AFTER ROSWELL, technology that can be used for motives of profit and prestege through patents. However, if the deal was technology in return for turning a blind eye to abductions and sexual abuse, or if drug money was used to finance joint Government-alien operations, then serious crimes were committed. Those who were in the know, and are guilty of allowing adbuctions in exchange for wealth, would surely do their best to keep disclosure from happening. Nobody wants to go from a position of power to a prison. This being so, it's unlikely that disclosure will come at once unless it serve ET's purpose. But this doesn't mean that people will never learn the truth. It just means that that we will have to work hard to learn it, and not be intimidated by those who challenge our sanity for doing so.

      Six years ago in 2009 I not only published Figure 2, but my son and I also began an on-going study of Martian air pressure. The transliteration of MARS on the matrix is not very significant mathematically. There was about 1 chance in 2 to find it or another transliteration of Mars, but it is now my belief that the route to disclosure goes through the data we have amassed in our Report, Mars Correct: Critique of All NASA Mars Weather Data, with Emphasis on Pressure. Links to the Basic Report, Annexes and Powerpoints are included below. While, before starting the Mars research, I always thought that Mars was unrelated to the issue of UFOs, I now think that our Mars Correct report points to the Achilles’ Heel of NASA. The report documents what must be a history or incompetence and/or disinformation.

     When you watch the Buzz Aldrin disclosure video, note the tone is his voice and the look (nervous concern) in his eyes when he tells us about the monolith on Phobos. Also note the rude arm that reaches in front of him to rip the script from before his face, and how fast C-SPAN cut him off the air when he said what he did.

      One thing I am certain about - the picture of Mars given to the public is incorrect (which is why the Report below includes Mars Correct in its title) The atmospheric pressure of Mars is far higher than what's been announced.  The proof for this assertion can be had at the following sites (Abstracts are also included below):

BASIC REPORT FOR MARS CORRECT:

CRITIQUE OF ALL NASA MARS WEATHER DATA,

WITH EMPHASIS ON PRESSURE 

By Barry S. Roffman and David A. Roffman

ABSTRACT: We present evidence that NASA is seriously understating Martian air pressure. Our 5-year study critiques 669 sols of highly problematic MSL REMS weather data, and offers an in depth audit of hourly Viking 1 and 2 weather reports. We discuss analysis of technical papers, NASA documents, and personal interviews of transducer designers. We troubleshoot pressures based on radio occultation/spectropersonal interviews of transducer designers. We troubleshoot pressures based on radio occultation/spectroscopy, and the small pressure ranges that could be measured by Viking (18 mbar), Pathfinder and Phoenix (12 mbar), and MSL (11.5 mbar – with this pressure measured on its sol 370, though later revised down to 8.65 mbar after we made an issue out of it). Vikings and MSL showed consistent timing of daily pressure spikes. We link this to how gas pressure in a sealed container would vary with Absolute temperature, to heating by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs), and to dust clots at air access tubes and dust filters. Pathfinder, Phoenix and MSL wind measurement failures are disclosed. Phoenix and MSL pressure transducer design problems are highlighted with respect to confusion about dust filter location, and lack of information about nearby heat sources due to International Traffic and Arms Regulations (ITAR). NASA could not replicate dust devils at 10 mbar. Rapidly filled MER Spirit tracks required wind speeds of 80 mph at the assumed low pressures. These winds were never recorded on Mars. Nor could NASA explain drifting Barchan sand dunes.

       Based on the above and dust devils on Arsia Mons to altitudes of 17 km above areoid (Martian equivalent of sea level), spiral storms with 10 km eye-walls above Arsia Mons, dust storm opacity, snow at Phoenix, excessive aerobraking, and stratus clouds 13 km above areoid, we argue for an average pressure at areoid of ~511 mbar rather than the accepted 6.1 mbar. This pressure grows to 1,050 mbar in the Hellas Basin.

ANNEXES FOR MARS CORRECT:

CRITIQUE OF ALL NASA MARS WEATHER DATA,

WITH EMPHASIS ON PRESSURE 

By Barry S. Roffman

       After a cursory review of the Viking Project Data it became apparent that an extensive audit was imperative. The Viking Project Data did not s A general discussion of the problems is offered in the Basic Report by David Roffman. The data audit results are presented in seven Annexes. The Viking Project data divides every Martian day into 25 time-bins (hours), each ~59 minutes long. Annex A (Viking 1 sols 1 to 350) and Annex B (Viking 2 sols 156 to 361) emphasize how pressures change during morning time-bins that correspond to 0630 to 0830. A simple formula, Pressure predicted = (6.51 mbar*255.77 K)/Temperature K measured, was often correct for 0730. Annex C examines how often the pressure sensor did not work (stuck or no pressures) between Viking 2 sols 639 and 799. Annex D examines the percent differences between hourly predictions and reported pressures for Viking 1 from sols 1 to 350. Annex E focuses on predictions and reported pressures for the 0.3 (0730) and .34 (0830) time-bins. Annex F maps out the best and worst prediction times each day, clearly proving the influence of the RTG heaters on hourly pressure reports. Annex G shows what went wrong in the transducer selection and testing process. Annex H describes windsock calibration efforts for Mars Pathfinder. Annex I documents the Rover Environmental Monitoring Station (REMS) Team and Ashima Research daily weather reports for the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity Rover. Annex J documents concessions by Ashima Research and shows how to correctly calculate daylight hours for MSL. Annex K displays original REMS Team and Ashima Research weather reports from Sol 15 to 299.Annex L presents variation of daylight due to change of latitude and solar longitude. Annex M presents the first Martian year of MSL weather reports. These Annexes provide hard evidence that the Tavis pressure transducers used for the Vikings (and Pathfinder) likely jammed with dust during the landing process. The meaning of this is that it is doubtful that they ever measured ambient pressure conditions of Mars.  There is evidence that all subsequent attempts to measure pressure were colored by the reported Viking results. Problems with Phoenix pressures based on a Vaisala transducer are discussed in the Basic Report.