2012 U.S. ELECTION CHOICES - OBAMA LOSSES

The axis term on this matrix is an unusually long 10-letter ELS for OBAMA LOSS. The timing for the loss is possibly given with the open text reference to SECOND TIME (the 2012 election). I went looking first for Donald TRUMP because his popularity soared since announcing that he is investigating Obama’s birthplace. It took 165 letters to include a transliteration of TRUMP on the matrix. Up until Trump’s announcement, I favored Mike Huckabee, and I thought that Romney was too boring and problematic because like Obama, he supported a state-run public health program. However in examining the matrix I see that ROMNEY has a better fit with OBAMA LOSS. He shares a letter with the axis term, and it only requires 40 letters to display both ELSs (there was about 1 chance in 58 for such a match). If we include SECOND TIME then the matrix is 80 letters, still less than half what is required to show TRUMP with OBAMA LOSS. But at 80 letters, there was 1 chance in 17 to find ROMNEY spelled this way, and other spellings also exist. Perhaps the ticket will be ROMNEY and TRUMP although then it’s harder to for TRUMP to utter his favorite words so much, “YOU’RE FIRED!” Whatever happens, Obama has been long overdue to produce a legitimate birth certificate.

     Part of the problem with using matrices like this is that if the future is fixed, that would imply no free will (see my page on Talmud and Names).  But there is another problem – even if the Code was meant to be predictive.  Scientists now postulate the existence of parallel universes, with a possible ever increasing number of universes as number of choices and potential outcomes increase.  If these exist, the code may show alternate futures simply because it was designed to show alternate universes.  Understanding the Code (if it is real) then rests on knowing which universe you exist in; however, before getting too spun up based a simple matrix like this, remember that when the 5^th lowest ELS of John McCain and President were this close, the statistical significance was just .0356 or about 1 chance in 28. For more on such matches, see the Torah Code study of U.S. Presidents by my son, David Roffman. 

Schrödinger's-cat and Politics. On April 14, 2011, an article appeared at FoxNews.Com about a breakthrough in the teleportation of light. This actually isn’t the first time physicists have teleported particles or light in this way. What differentiates the new research is that this time they teleported something much more complicated. This teleported light wasn't just any light — it was in a special quantum state called a Schrödinger's-cat state. The article states:

       "Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment invented by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935 to describe a truth about quantum mechanics: that some properties of particles are not decided until an outsider forces them to choose by measuring them. Schrödinger envisioned a cat inside a box that contained a small amount of a radioactive substance. Within an hour, there would be a 50 percent chance the substance would decay, releasing poison into the box, and a 50 percent chance the substance would not decay and no poison would be released.

       According to the rules of quantum mechanics, the cat is neither dead nor alive until the box is opened and an outside observer "measures" the situation. While the box remains closed, the whole system is suspended in a state of uncertainty where the cat is both dead and alive. Schrödinger intended the story to sound a bit ridiculous — he was using it to highlight how bizarre the ideas of quantum mechanics would be if extended beyond particles to the macro world of everyday objects. Nonetheless, the strange situation remains a fundamental part of the theory of quantum mechanics, and experiments verify that particles really do seem to exist in these suspended states of multiple possibilities until forced into one situation or another by measurements."

     So how does this relate to the matrices on this page about who gets elected? In the case of Schrödinger's cat, we know that the cat is likely to be dead or alive in the box. because we placed the cat in its precarious situation. We know the box is cannot have a dog in it. As we only know the fate of the cat when we open the box, we know that Obama, Huckabee, Romney and Trump are all in the political box for now, but we do not know who wins until we open the ballot box. We do not have ex-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in the box because we know that he was born in Austria on July 30, 1947 which makes him ineligible to be the U.S. President.  Of course, President Obama’s grandmother is quoted as saying she was in the delivery room with our President was born in Mombasa, Kenya (as Donald Trump believes), but Obama doesn’t have the accent to give him away the way Schwarzenegger does. Meanwhile, like the box holding Schrödinger's cat, the Torah Code appears to hold multiple possible outcomes.

     And my choice as of April 14, 2011?  Anybody but Obama.  I'd vote for Governor Huckabee (despite his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations).  He comes across very well on his Fox News TV show, and he supports biblical ideas about Israel. I'd vote for Trump because I think he has the money to be independent, the guts to point out real concerns about Obama's birth place, and the strength to take on our enemies. My support for Romney would only fit under the luke warm anybody by Obama category. Sarah Palin went off my personal radar screen when she resigned as Governor of Alaska.