6/11/2020 UPDATE TO THE EBRAHIMI METEORITE SITUATION.
SITREP posted on 6/11/2020
If DOD and UK MOD want to play this game my way it should provide a line for secure communications, but apparently they want to stick with passive monitoring of what I release while gathering more Essential Elements of Information from other sources. This is understandable. The wide view includes how Communist China has likely used a virus from the meteorite in question to kill over 415,000 people including at least 114,452 Americans and 41,128 British folks. Beyond the total here of 155,580 dead, they have caused trillions of dollars of damage to our economies. Normally China’s actions would be considered casus belli, but the war could easily go nuclear. Nobody sane wants that and so I am forced to accept multiple risks, which are national, industrial and personal.
What follows below is not as dramatic as my previous revelations about how the so-called Chinese Wuhan COVID-19 coronavirus found its way from a meteorite under water just south of Sooke, Canada to Dr. Chandra Wickramasinghe at the University of Buckingham in the UK and then to his Sri Lankan home where he claims the sample was stolen. From there it apparently found its way to his Chinese viral research partner, Dr. Jiangwen Qu of the Department of Infectious Disease Control, Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China. Next stops: Wuhan and then the world. While Wickramasinghe was wrongly trusted with a sample of the meteorite and embryo-like object, the main 27-pound meteorite remains under the care of Dr. Elaine Humphrey at the University of Victoria in Canada. It appears that our communications link has been cut by her, but I last sent her the e-mail below. DR. E. HUMPHREY is the axis term on Figure 2 below. She is encoded with WUHAN at skip +1 and SOOKE at the same skip as her name.
FIGURE 1 ABOVE: Craig Ebrahimi seeks himself as the TRILLION DOLLAR MAN, Actually, if his meteorite is the real source of the Wuhan Virus, it has cost many trillions of dollars so far.
E-MAIL PARTIALLY FORWARDED BY BARRY ROFFMAN TO DR. HUMPPREY ON JUNE 8, 2020. I have left off the name of the company asking to review a proposed article about Mars.
to: David Roffman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
date: Jun 5, 2020, 10:23 AM
subject: Invitation to review for CENSORED
Dear Dr. (David) Roffman,
I would like to invite you to review the above referenced manuscript, as I believe it falls within your expertise and interest. The abstract for this manuscript is included below.
PART OF THE ABSTRACT STATES:
There is no conclusive proof of current or past life on Mars. However, there is considerable evidence based on Martian meteors ... regions of Mars ... may be inhabited by methanogens and oxygen producing organisms such as algae/cyanobacteria and lichens that may be responsible for the significant increases in Martian atmospheric oxygen and methane during the spring and summer
David and I have begun on the review which hopefully also results in an invitation to publish our commentary. As you may perceive from the extract above the life forms mentioned makes no reference to viruses. My son and I published jointly about Mars as is evident from our 1,200 page paper published by the Mars Society at http://www.marspapers.org/paper/Roffman_2020.contrib.pdf. The Journal of Astrobiology only listed David as the author of another article at http://journalofastrobiology.com/Mars18.html , because he has the doctorate, but I wrote (most of) the article and I listed myself in the acknowledgments section.
As you know, while everyone else involved seemed to have money only on their minds with the main meteorite, from day 1 (January 26, 2020) when I became involved my concern was over the possibility of a pandemic. We did not have one then, but we certainly do now.
MY NEW COMMENT ON THE MONEY ISSUE IS TO QUOTE DR. HUMPHREY'S E-MAIL TO WICKRAMASINGHE ON MAY AT 17, 2019 AT 00:13 WHICH REFERS TO CRAIG AS A CLIENT:
I have a client, Craig Ebrahimi, who brought in a meteorite. At first it looked like gabbro but the chemical analysis (by Act labs) proved it to be a meteorite. I understand that he sent you thin sections, outside crust, a piece of the rock with a embryo fossil in a white circle.
CONTINUING WITH MY E-MAIL TO DR. HUMPHREY: Chandra (Wickramasinghe) wrote you about the theft of the sample, but I am damn sure that he himself is the thief and that he worked with Jiangwen Qu and the Chinese Government to analyze it, weaponize it and distribute it to its primary targets, especially in the U.S. which now leads the world in deaths ( 112,054 ) as of June 8, 2020. Chandra and Jiangwen Qu published a prediction of a pandemic to arrive within a few months on November 25, 2019, only 15 days before it hit Wuham. I document all this in detail on my Arkcode.com website for two primary readers here many times each day (DoD at Fort Huachuca and the UK MOD).
I have asked UK MOD to pick up Wickramasinghe for questions if he returns to the UK from Sri Lanca, China or wherever he might be now - possibly with a Japanese CEO of Kyoto Biopharma - Gensuke Tokoro (who is also Director of the Institute for the Study of Panspermia and Astroeconomics, Gifu, Japan). The MOD doesn't talk to me directly, they just read me constantly without attempting to hide their identity.
Now, besides nabbing Chandra (IF he passed on the virus to China and it's the same virus as COVID-19) for mass murder, there is the question of how you really fit in with all this. I assume that you are a victim of Chandra, but I'm still missing a lot of the data. According to Craig there were 3 tests for the origin of the meteorite. Two said it was from Mars and one said no - it was likely lunar or from 4 Vesta. If it is from Mars this has enormous consequences
I would like to work your comments into our review for the new paper about how the temperature properties and in particular the condensation issue may indicate a virus. We will want to discuss the oxygen 17 /18) question. Our review will not discuss legal issues, but obviously whatever you write will be tracked by the intel agencies involved. Failure to respond will also be noted on the e-mail record. So this is a chance to spin the issue as you like and to separate yourself and Dr. Sawiki from Chandra.
Please call me with your answers, if any.
Barry S. Roffman
FIGURE 2 BELOW: The axis term is DR. E. HUMPHREY. At the same absolute skips are SOOKE (which is where the Ebrahimi meteorites are from) and MOON which might be their source though this is in dispute and personality conflicts are affecting the final results which may point to MARS (on the matrix at skip -10). MARS is more statistically significant than the MOON. The apparent embryos on the main meteorite is backed by EMBRYO at skip -1 on the matrix. THE PLAGUE and WUHAN are both on the matrix at skip +1. WUHAN only occurs in Torah twice at skip +1 (best case scenario). It was found on the full 1,012-letter matrix against odds of about 151 to 1. It only takes 21 rows and 23 columns (483 letters) to show it with DR. E. HUMPHREY. Odds against a match this close are about 316 to 1. Odds against all of Figure 2 are about 759,695 to 1.