Where Did the Ebrahimi Meteorites Come From?

LETTER TO DR. AARON BURTON (@ NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER) FROM DR. JERZY SAWICKI SENT ON JULY 15, 2019.

Dear Dr Aaron Burton,

Thank you very much for your interest in two meteorites discovered by Mr. Craig Ibrahimi that are currently being examined by us here at the University of Victoria, BC.  In a follow-up of emails and samples you received from Mr. Ebrahimi, we would like to provide you with some additional information about this project.

I’m Dr Jerzy Sawicki, nuclear and materials physicist retired from Atomic Energy of Canada laboratories in Chalk River, Ontario.  I am presently located in Victoria, British Columbia.  I organized a Mossbauer spectroscopy laboratory at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Victoria, and collaborate with the scientists, engineers and students here.  And in this project, with Dr Elaine Humphrey in our Advanced Microscopy Facility - Unniversity of Victoria.

Several months back we were approached by Mr. Craig Ebrahimi, a resident of Sooke on the southern tip of Vancouver Island, along Juan de Fuca Strait.  Mr. Ebrahimi showed us two rocky objects that he found in Sooke Basin using very sensitive magnetic pulse analyser.  Object #1 – as large as about 30x20x10 cm - he recovered during diving at the depth of 12 m of water from under 3 m of sludge.  Object #2 – about 15x10x10 cm in size - he located close to the water line. Both indicate magnetic properties and #1 has a prominent and not flaked-off fusion crust.

#1 is very black outside with less than 0.5 mm-thick crust, is dark grey-greenish when cut and polished, and its powder is grey.  #2 is brownish outside and inside, its powder is light-brown.

Notably, during the last glaciation, the ice flowed westward along the Juan de Fuca Strait.  When about 15,000 years ago the ice started to melt it left large amount of deposits and very likely meteorites as well.  The water near the bottom of Sooke Basin is anoxic.

The chemical analyses of both objects performed for us by Actlabs in Ancaster, Ontario, indicated elements in proportions characteristic of achondrites; #1- likely from Mars* or 4 Vesta, and #2 - likely from Moon.  Thus, the object #1 could be by far the largest Martian meteorite ever found.  Samples examined by Actlabs indicated a loss ion ignition of 3.45% in #1 and 2.45% in #2.  Oxygen isotopes analysis in Actlabs is in progress.

Dr Elaine Humphrey - marine microbiologist - performed many SEM-EDX analyses of thick fragments and thin slices from both objects.  We have been impressed by some unusual distributions of elements and some surprising white inclusions.  Examination of Raman spectra taken for white inclusions is presently in progress.

I have performed numerous Mossbauer spectroscopy analyses of iron in the crust and down to 10 mm depth in both objects.  The results for #1 show up to 60% of Fe in black crust in a form of magnetite, decreasing to 20-30% of Fe in magnetite in deeper layers.  The rest of Fe is in a form of Fe2+ in M1 and M2 sites of pyroxene type of mineral, with some 20% of Fe3+ in a paramagnetic state.  The results for #2 show Fe mostly as hematite in crust, with small fraction of magnetite as well.  The parameters of Fe2+ in #2 seem to correspond to that known for eucrite.

My analysis of XRD patterns confirms the presence of magnetite in #1 and magnetite and hematite in #2, whereas the dominant diffraction peaks in #1 represent ferrous diopside and tremolite.  In #2 ferroan anchorite and albite fit best to the patterns.

As the research in astro-bio-mineralogy has been recently so much intensified, especially due to Martian and lunar meteoriites and rock studies, we feel that we cannot ignore the possible significance of both #1 and #2 for this realm of science.

We would appreciate your advice and help in further research of these objects, as well as in search for any signs of organic matter or even fossils in them, with the excellent equipment and expertise acquired in your laboratory.

Sincerely,

Dr Jerzy Sawicki

Research Gate address: (2) Jerzy A. Sawicki. 

*The claim that meteorite #1 is from Mars is disputed By Dr. Karen Ziegler who on September 6, 2019 sent an e-mail to Craig that said, "In terms of oxygen isotopes, definitely neither one of your rocks is Martian. Based only on my results they could be:  lunar (or E-chondrites, but they don’t appear to be chondrites,  D17O values are typical for the moon. You need to know the theremineralogy and the mineral chemistry in order to determine which of these types they could be. Do you have EMPA analyses of the minerals?? Mn/Fe ratios (see attached figure)?"

       The asteroid 4 Vesta is also a possible source. From the e-mail record, it appears that Dr. Aaron Burton did not answer Dr. Sawicki until March 10, 2020 (as the COVID-19 crisis was shutting down Government offices) when he wrote to Craig stating:

Hi Craig,

It doesn’t look like my lab will be functional any time soon. I’ll get the samples sent back to you this week.

Sorry!

Aaron

IS THERE AN ALIEN INTELLIGENCE INVOLVED WITH CRAIG'S METEORITES? The question of where the meteorites come from is primarily addressed by focusing on the deuterium oxide and known values of hydrogen or deuterium on Mars, the moon and 4 Vesta. Martian water is enriched in deuterium (D), hydrogen's heavier isotope, compared with most water in the solar system. The cause of the enrichment is the preferential escape to space of H. The D/H ratio in Mars's air is now about 6 × SMOW (standard mean ocean water; that is, Earth) and was roughly the same 180 million years ago, as recorded by water trapped in martian meteorites (3). Curiosity has found in a single sample that D/H was only 3 × SMOW when a mudstone formed in a cold little pond at the bottom of Gale crater some 3 billion years ago. Of course Curiosity has not surveyed all of Mars for deuterium levels, in fact the readings on the prevalence of methane have changed a lot since it landed. Elsewhere on this site I discuss Dr. John Brandenberg's hypothesis that there was a nuclear war on Mars. When? Again, about 180 million years ago. As for levels typical on the moon, we have no samples from the far side, so I'm not sure about how complete our portrait of it is today.

      What about 4-Vesta? On January 28, 2015 Dr. G. Jeffrey Taylor  wrote, "Eucrite meteorites come from asteroid 4 Vesta, which was recently studied from orbit by NASA's Dawn mission. Adam Sarafian (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute) and colleagues at Woods Hole, the University of Bristol, England, and the University of New Mexico measured the hydrogen concentration and deuterium/hydrogen (D/H) ratio in crystals of the mineral apatite (calcium phosphate) in eucrites. They found that the D/H ratio is in the same range as in carbonaceous chondrites, most samples of the Earth's mantle, and in samples of basaltic meteorites from Mars. Combined with measurements of the isotopic compositions of nitrogen and carbon, the data suggest that these volatile elements were added to Earth early in its history, probably during its formation. Other studies conclude that water with D/H like that in carbonaceous chondrites, Earth, Mars, and Vesta were likely inherited from interstellar ice that predates formation of the solar system.

     When we ask the question of where Craig's rocks came from, the vast majority of scientists will look at issues like isotope content. I would agree that this is where to start, but I like to think outside the box. This box has been labeled "weird" by Dr. Elaine Humphrey.  Between faces in the rocks, persistent cold temperatures that cause water condensation, a finder who (with his wife) ate a sample of the meteorite, and "voices" that he said he heard telepathically that took him to the right coordinates underwater, we need to investigate the possibility that an ET intelligence (that could generate such coordinates) is involved. As I write these words on April 28, 2020 I see on Fox.com that the Pentagon is officially releasing videos of Navy FA-18 fighters chasing 40-foot UFOs in 2004 and 2015. Is is described and backed by 3 videos on CBS, CNN, and WIRED. The Navy filmed these objects off our coasts from Virginia down to Florida and off California. As I have written before I saw a UFO on my 10th birthday. More, as I published before being interviewed by a gentleman from Fort Huachuca, my father's brother was involved in back-engineering what was found in Roswell. As for Foxnews.com, on the night of April 28, 2020 they had a speaker (Dr. Steven Greer) on that claimed that some UFOS are indeed of extraterrestrial origin while others UFOs are human creations by a group dedicated to overthrowing our Constitution. Frankly, my sole encounter with a guy who was stationed at Fort Huachuca started off with a distinctly nasty and unconstitutional threat made by him, but the ~30 minute interview ended on a friendlier basis complete with tidbits of information that have been quite helpful to my research (especially with respect to the nature of time).  I would go into more detail here, but it's covered elsewhere on my site and often visited by Huachuca. I'll skip over it for now, largely because if this whole deal turns into an "intergalactic kegger" although I'll be 73 on May, I'd like to be recalled to active duty with a rank of colonel doing intel for our new Space Force.

      Let me clarify what I see going on, and here I speak with the experience of having written many war plans for Coast Guard and Navy. We are under attack. At a minimum the attack is likely being carried out by China, possibly with the aid of Russia, Iran and North Korea, but the evidence that I have against Dr. Chandra Wickramasinghe only leads from Craig's meteorite to Jiangwen Qu of the Department of Infectious Disease Control, Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hedong Qu, Tianjin Shi, China.  There is an issue as to whether the viruses on Craig's rocks were programmed or intelligent enough to conduct an attack directed largely against the United States and key allies in Europe. Most of the Coast Guard plans that I wrote were between 500 and 750 pages. A number of them were written while I was in a Reserve status - before I returned to active duty between the ages of 55 and 60. Some were published after only two or three weeks of work. How did I do this? By capitalizing on the difference between "boilerplate" and geographic-specific information.  What does that mean? Let's say that I wrote a plan that worked well for Sector Seven (most of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This first plan took the most time to get right. But once I had it, I could fly to Alaska with the same text, copy the common doctrine (boilerplate) which would be most of the Plan, then focus on what was specific for Alaska (District 17) or later Hawaii (District 14), Washington and Oregon (District 13) or California (District 11). Likewise, all the Chinese had to do was write a basic operations plan for an attack on the United States, NATO, etc. and then simply wait for one of two things to happen - the Wuhan Virology Institute or Chinese Center for Disease Control in Wuhan to develop a pathogen, or someone to sell it to them or an aligned force like the People’s Liberation Army of China or the Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

       Before looking at the possibility that China deliberately launched this attack with or without an alien ally, let's look up at Table 1 for some of the casualties as of April 28, 2020. While the virus is believed to have begun its attack on people in Wuhan, and while it took about two months to start killing Americans, by April 28, 2020 the number of declared deaths in China was 4,633 while in the U.S. it was up to 58,955. During the Vietnam War the communists killed just 47,474 Americans. If we included all U.S. deaths in Vietnam the count grows to 58,209 so the Wuhan virus has killed more in just about two months. During the Korean War we had 33,686 killed in action, with a total death toll of 36,516. So the Wuhan War Plan was deadlier, and it constitutes a devastating attack on our economy and on our fleet. It's also a well-written plan in that if I had not received the e-mail invitation that I did from Craig Ebrahimi on January 26, 2020, it is doubtful that anyone would have been able to link his meteorite with the Department of Infectious Disease Control, Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China.

NATO TARGETS AND KILL RATIOS. In looking over Table 1 all five nations each with death tolls over 25,000 as of May 5, 2020 are members of NATO. They include the U.S., (71,921) the United Kingdom (29,427) Italy (29,315), Spain (26,613), and France (25,531), and. The total is 182,807 dead. In looking at five key opponents the numbers were as follows: China (4,633 with no change over the last week), Russia (1,451), Belarus (107 - they are part of the Russian Federation), Iran (6,340) and North Korea (0). All of these are believed to be low-ball lies but if true the total is just 12,5316. During the Vietnam War we used to talk about kill ratio. If the enemy numbers just given are correct there would be a kill ratio of about 14.588 to 1, with the NATO on the losing side of this figure. Since the dying supposedly started in China in January, 2020, it's a strange ratio to find in May, 2020. While it is often written that no war plan survives first contact with the enemy, these numbers look like a combination of a brilliant war plan and disinformation. But are we just looking at the results of a Chinese war plan, one written in cooperation with Russia, and North Korea? The high death toll in Iran (likely much higher than the 6,340 quoted) suggests that Iran was not part of such a plan. Or was this plan written with a combination of Chinese and alien intelligence or simply by an alien intelligence and if so, why?