IMPLICATIONS OF BIBLICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY

       This article is dedicated to Fort Huachuca since in 2016 they sent an agent to ask me about artificial intelligence and nanotechnology. The search here had the purpose of learning how these two subjects are addressed in Torah. The axis term is a transliteration of NANOTECHNOLOGY. Vowel marks are implied but not shown in Torah. Assume that the gimel (g) at the end of the axis term has a hiraq (dot) under it. Like other technology, nanotechnology can be a blessing (as in medicine) or a curse/weapon. Crossing NANOTECHNOLOGY is THE BLESSING AND THE CURSE. Touching it is an ELS of WEAPON. At the same absolute skip as NANOTECHNOLOGY are FAKE (synonym - ARTIFICIAL) and INTELLIGENCE. YOU DESTROY AND DO NOT SPARE THE PLACE in the open text shares a letter samech with TO/FOR MARS at the skip of the axis term. Nanotechnology involves incredibly small carbon tubes. CARBON is also at the same skip as NANOTECHNOLOGY. As for aliens, in the open text is STARS, ALL THE ARMY OF HEAVEN/SKY. Two lines below it (at skip -1) is IN A UFO. Finally, the Jewish High Priest wore a breastplate with urim and thummim in it. The breastplate was apparently a technological communications device with urim containing jewels that lit up to reveal a Divine message. BREAST PLATE is on the matrix touching TO/FOR MARS. URIM is also in the open text.

STATISTICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is attached to the 9-letter axis term, here a transliteration of NANOTECHNOLOGY at its only ELS in wrapped Torah. The odds against this matrix existing and/or being found were about 2.4 quadrillion to 1. If you read my site often you know that I never quote odds that significant, and in this case there were important terms left off the calculation shown above simply because they were not found a priori - meaning that I did not guess I would find them before doing the experiment. I am not particularly happy about the meaning of this find. This matrix hit me like the conclusions of two movies starring Charlton Heston. On one, Soylent Green, Heston comes to realize that the favorite food, soylent green, is in fact made of dead people. In the other, Planet of the Apes, while riding a horse on the beach of what he thought was another planet he turns a corner and finds a mostly buried Statue of Liberty. I don't set out to find matrices that back my beliefs. I don't let me feelings about what I find interfere with deciding what to publish. But I do believe that the truth, whatever it is, needs to be known. There is still room for God to be found to be the Encoder, but there is no need for us to impose our desires on what He (or It) is. Those who create a god in the image of their beliefs are idolaters. I am willing to give God a chance, but in the end He only merits that title if, perhaps by reversing time, He resurrects the dead who are worthy of it. For as Ezekiel 37:13 says:

Then you shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O My people, and brought you up from your graves.

       May that day come before we have tasted of death.

Key Words in Decreasing Order of Significance. We are trying to determine Nature of an Encoder Who has always been reluctant when it comes to showing His Face.  Indeed, we read in Torah that, "No man can see My Face and live." The question of whether the Being that Moses encountered was truly God or an alien being has been a popular one ever since Erich Von Däniken published his book entitled Chariots of the Gods? Beings called Nephilim who are "sons of God" (B'nei ha Elohim) interbreed with human females in Genesis 6:4. Further, the flying throne of God, the Merkavah (Ezekiel 1:1 to 1:28, Ezekiel 3:12), appears to be mechanical in nature complete with landing gear (Ezekiel 1:7). Elijah goes off to heaven in a fiery chariot that also sounds a lot like a rocket (2nd Kings 2:9-11).

A POSTERIORI TERMS ON FIGURE 1

THE BLESSING AND THE CURSE,  YOU DESTROY AND DO NOT SPARE THE PLACE and TO SHOW MY POWER were all found by accident (a posteriori) and are therefore not counted in the combined odds given on Table 1.

ANALYSIS OF TERMS - TRYING TO IDENTIFY THE ENCODER. In looking at the potential Encoder, the above terms only represent one out of thousands of matrices that I've found over the last 22 years of research, but the combined odds here are probably the most significant that I've seen. Accordingly on Table 4 we place all terms in columns that pertain to traditional understanding of God, aliens, a human from our future universe or a parallel universe, and an A.I. As can be seen, many of the terms work equally well in any column, but the most fits are found in the alien column. This does not mean that aliens created the universe, unless our real universe is only composed of data such as that envisioned in the movie entitled THE MATRIX.

        While in general I try to analyze all Codes questions in accordance with the Scientific Method, in doing so I am always aware of the monitoring of my sites (and life) by Fort Huachuca, an Army Intelligence Base. In particular I am aware that they control my web site host and when I tried to switch to two new hosts I found that DoD controlled them too. I documented this earlier today, but then suffered two attacks so I'll withhold the sensitive details for now. This article is already provocative enough.

       It seems like DoD (and/or UK MOD) control everything I produce. That's OK - in doing so they verify the importance of everything I do in trying to arrive at the ultimate truth. I prefer to work peacefully with our Government.  I have asked for this, terms, and a nondisclosure agreement many times but they never answered me directly. Ditto with my presentation to them of Project Creator Decoder which would allow for a radical improvement in decoding the Torah and all its military and scientific data.

      How shall we view the UFO/alien angle? While it has long been Government policy to mock those who say they've seen them (or been abducted by them), I have evidence that they are very real. Now, why am I writing about UFOs here? I do so because there is an issue of whether the most important piece of literature on the planet has internal open text and encoded data hinting at a role played by aliens in producing it. UFOs are real. But to bring them into a Torah discussion we need to tie our argument in with evidence. Here I offer what I was given by my 93-tear old uncle (see Figure  2) who was just about on his death bed when he let me have a list of U.S., Allied, and Warsaw Pact (enemy) scientists who were working with him in 1960 to back-engineer at least one crashed UFO. We also need to view the USS Nimitz 2004 UFO film footage recently released by the U.S. Navy.   

First Roswell Disclosure, December 24, 1997, Hallandale Beach Florida – The Night that Our Family and Lives Changed.

       December 24, 1997 was a night that was a huge stimulus for my UFO and Mars research. It was Christmas Eve. My family is Jewish. I was 50. Jews don't celebrate Christmas, but we do get together then. The night is known to us as Nittel Nacht. We are generally prohibited from studying Talmud, or having sex. But a lot of us eat (hopefully kosher) Chinese food then.

       That evening our family had a large reunion at my Uncle Eugene’s condo. It’s possible that I might have been near Stan Gross at earlier family gatherings, but I was never introduced to him before. My uncle told me that Stan worked at the Kennedy Space Center where he played a key role in deciding when astronauts would be sent up. As is shown on Figure 3, Stan coordinated the checkout of the Lunar Rover for Apollo 15. Uncle Eugene was my father’s brother. Stan was my uncle's wife’s nephew.

       Both of my sons were there that night. At the time, my older son was a 20-year old Air Force ROTC cadet and geophysics major at M.I.T. He was slated to report to U.S. Space Command at Vandenberg Air Force Base upon graduation. My highest hope was that he would become an astronaut, and eventually reach Mars where his geophysics background would really pay off. My younger son, David, was only 4, though a very bright 4. He had started to speak sentences at the age of 3 months. Later he would earn his B.S. in Space Physics at the age of 18, his Master's in physics at 20 and his PhD in physics at the age of 23 he has his PhD in solid state physics. He did his postdoc at Yale after that. David is my primary partner in Martian meteorology research. See http://davidaroffman.com/.

       For most of my meeting with Stan in 1997 we were discussing how my older son could enter the astronaut program and what the career entailed. But before we left, at around 10:00 pm when Stan and I were in the kitchen I mentioned a book by Dr. Kevin D. Randall about Roswell that I had read a week before. I didn’t expect much of an answer, but I was wrong.

       I asked him, “What do you think about Roswell?”

       His answer was, “It happened.”

       Shocked, I asked, “What do you mean it happened?

       He just said, “It happened.”

       Again, I asked, “Do mean to say that we captured a flying saucer near Roswell?

       He shook his head, “Yes.”

       I asked him, “How would you know?”

       He said, “I saw it.”

       “When,” I asked him?

      “1964”

       “Where,” I asked.

       “It’s too classified. I can’t tell you."

       At this point I called my older son (who recently retired as a major in the Air Force Reserve) and a cousin into the kitchen, and then I asked Stan to repeat to them what he told me. If I didn’t do this they'd never believe that I was told such things. Stan complied, and repeated everything said above.

       I continued the questions without a word being uttered by son son or by my cousin. Years later I still wonder if my cousin asked nothing because he already knew. I can’t remember the precise order of my questions, but overall they were as follows:

       “Did you ever tell your wife?”

       “No,” Stan said. “I didn’t want to upset her.”

       “Why were you shown this thing?”

       He said he had a need to know. I can’t remember his exact words on why he had a need to know, but the thrust of it seemed to be that if a UFO was in the area, a scheduled launch couldn't proceed. There would be an excuse made, maybe something like a downrange emergency landing area had bad weather, or winds were too strong aloft, or lightning was too close to the launch pad. Since he had a say in any launch, he had a need to know that UFOs were more than weather balloons.

       I asked him if our contact with aliens was limited to the crash just outside of Roswell. Again, his answer was shocking.

       “There’s an ongoing relationship between them and our Government.”

       Here we came to the essential question of this article. I demanded to know, “Are they friendly or hostile?”

       “You don’t know what your neighbor is thinking,” he said.

       His answer reminded me of a former neighbor in Hypoluxo, Florida. The guy was a pervert and a crook. We caught him on our balcony trying to look in on my wife while she was dressing. We saw him going through garbage dumpsters looking for credit card receipts, likely to commit credit card fraud. When we near him, we would smile and say hello. Likewise he acted friendly. But my wife and I were asking the apartment management to evict him, while he was in fact burglarizing apartments and boats. Eventually he was caught stealing a boat motor, he was arrested and evicted. He never knew about our push to get rid of him, and we didn't know that he was a thief until the complex caught him. So this is how Stan viewed aliens.

       I left my Uncle’s condo feeling like I had been slugged by a two by four. If all this stuff were put out by Joe the Bartender, I would have blown it off. But it was said by a man who had the responsibility to launch astronauts into space. For two weeks I couldn’t sleep well. Finally I decided to call my uncle about the incident.

       “Uncle Eugene,” I asked, “Is Stan playing with a full deck?”

       “Why do you ask?”

       “Well, Stan said some pretty strange things,” I said.

       “Oh,” Uncle Gene said, “Stan’s a great kidder.” I felt relief when I heard it. But to be sure of what I was hearing I asked my Uncle, “So you know what he said at your place?”

       “No, what did he say?” I was asked. So I told him all of it. Now, as mentioned earlier, I grew up on the same street with my uncle. He was my favorite uncle, and I was in fact much closer to him than I was to my own father. I was 50 then, and when he died on September 11, 2008 I was 61. In all those years, I never heard him curse – except for when I told him what Stan had said. Then he told me, “You’re a G-d damned liar!”

       But, of course, I had two witnesses, my son and my first cousin. I asked my uncle to call his son and ask him what he heard. He did, and my uncle called me back about 10 minutes later.

       “Barry,” he said. "I want you to listen to me and listen real good. You heard nothing. And if you think you heard something you may wind up dead.” He hung up, and wouldn't talk to me for over two years after that. But immediately after the threatening call, I phoned my cousin.

       “You heard what I heard,” I said to him.

       “Yes I did,” my cousin said, "but I’m gonna forget that I heard it, and I think you should do the same." My cousin has always been a civilian. I have loved him like a brother all my life. He taught me how to ride a bike, how to play chess, and how to reach the Franklin Institute by bus and subway when I was ten years old. I always looked up to him because when we were young he knew more Hebrew than I did, he went to an Ivy League School, and he has a Masters degree in physics and a doctorate in management. When I wrote books, he would help edit them. When I needed math assistance for my Torah Codes or Mars research, he freely offered it. We both traveled great distances to be with each other for family events like bar mitzvahs, weddings or funerals. But I’m a military guy. And, as my Intelligence friends know, I don’t respond well to threats. I’m also ready to risk my life over important issues, and frankly, I don’t think anything could be more important than a UFO cover-up. So my response to the threat and to the advice to forget about it all was to start an in depth (and still ongoing) investigation. This article will go on to document what I have been able to learn so far.

Follow-up to the Threat of December 24, 1997. Needless to say, I was more than alarmed by what at first sounded like a threat to my life by my uncle. But with time I’ve come to understand that he wasn’t threatening to kill me, but warning me that if I pursued the subject the way he knew that I'm capable of pursing a problem, I might be killed by someone in our Government who enforces secrecy with respect to the Roswell Incident and similar occurrences. My cousin took the warning to heart, and so he fell in line with my uncle even after my uncle died. I don’t know if my uncle contacted my older son with a similar warning. He refused to discuss the subject with me whenever I tried. But I refused to fall in line. I hope this doesn’t turn out to be my epitaph, but if it does, nobody lives forever.

I needed to know whether Stan was serious or joking. My cousin, over the next 22 years, continued to insist that he had questioned Stan about his remarks and that Stan told him that he was pulling my leg. However Stan held a position that would make such behavior not only inappropriate, but dangerous. In fact, it wrecked several relationships in our family (possibly including one with my older son, who went in the Air Force not as a geophysicist, but as a chaplain). I saw Stan one more time after his original remarks and he made no effort to correct what he had said before. Nor do I believe that he ever make such a correction to my older son. I can’t say if he really made such a retraction to my cousin, but with time I came to see that my cousin had a problem with being candid about anything related to UFOs. My mother (now deceased) knew Stan. When I asked for her opinion she said, “Stan wouldn't say such a thing unless it were true, but he made a big mistake by telling you, because you have a big mouth and you’ll tell the world.” You’re reading this now because she’s right.

1997 was the year I began my Torah Code research. By 2000 I had joined a group of fellow Code researchers. Formed by Walter Keith York, we called ourselves the “Snoop Group.” One member gave the rest of us software called ZoneAlarm. It could block computer attacks, but also tell us the IP address of anyone who tried to hack into our systems. So, long before Edward Snowden made his revelations about the NSA monitoring everyone’s communications, I used it to try to test what Stan had to say. How? By setting a trap for the NSA and then waiting to see if they took the bait. I composed an e-mail with the full Stan story, and added two topics that were likely to have key words on NSA’s search list. One was the assassination of President Kennedy. It was common for UFO advocates to speculate that Kennedy was killed because he wanted to tell Americans about Roswell. The other topic was Dulce, New Mexico. There is an on-line book named The Dulce Book by Branton. It alleges that there is a joint U.S. Government- alien underground base in Dulce, New Mexico. My guess was that if Stan’s story was real one of two things should happen after I hit the send button on my computer – my phone would be tapped and there would be an attempt to hack into my computer. In fact, both happened almost immediately, both in my home and in the homes of message recipients. Indeed, for as long as I had ZoneAlarm on my system (a year or two), whenever I sent out an e-mail about UFOs, it indicated a hack attempt. That never happened before I sent out my message about Stan. In fact, Walt's wife received a threating phone call within 5 minutes of my e-mail coming across his system. She was told, "You live in the house across the street from the green and white house." The implied message seemed to be, We know where you are. Back off this topic. I don't want to go into detail, but Walt didn't have a natural death.

I don't think that I saw my uncle much again between 1997 and the death of his wife in 2004. I did attend her funeral on Philadelphia, but there were no serious conversations with him until after I retired from active duty in 2007. I took my wife and younger son around the world, and then we went to visit him in Florida. I came armed with our photo album; pictures of China, Mongolia, Russia, France, Israel, and many other wonders that we had seen in the past decade. Uncle Eugene then took out his photo album. We expected to see pictures of his many travels, and of my father with him over the 92 years of his life. But he only wanted us to see one thing shown below - the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Nondestructive Testing. I think it was the first item in his album, but I'm not certain. The conversation went as follows:

"I want you to see this," he said while handing me what is shown on Figure 3 of this page.

"I remember when you went to Japan," I told him.

"I want you to see who was there," he said. So I flipped through it, and spotted his name. He told me, "I want you to see who else was there." So I looked a bit more and spotted people from top academic institutions. The second name was associated with Oak Ridge, Tennessee where the atomic bomb was made. Hanford was there, and Livermore. "Yes," I said, "it's an impressive group." But that wasn't good enough for him.

"I want you to read all the names," he demanded. So I slowly went down each page. There was a guy (Edward Dugger) from Wright Patterson Air Force Base. That was where I heard they took most of the Roswell UFO wreckage. There was also a Dr. Gerold Tenney from Los Alamos. More Roswell wreckage was allegedly sent there on July 9, 1947, but what really surprised me was that there were three scientists from the U.S.S.R and one from its Warsaw Pact partner, Poland. This conference was held in 1960 at the height of the Cold War.

"What the hell?" I said. "This is what you wanted me to see?" He just smiled. So I drew my conclusion and expressed it.

"You did non-destructive testing. So, if the Israelis captured a Russian made MiG or radar, and they gave it to the U.S. we use non-destructive testing to figure out how it works, and how to defeat it. And the Russians would do likewise with what they capture from our side. It looks like everyone on this list from our side would have had a top secret clearance. The same is probably true on the Russian side. Bringing these people together makes it look like maybe we had a common enemy. Are you trying to tell me that at the height of the Cold War we had a common enemy - UFOs?"

WAS THERE EVER A NUCLEAR WAR ON MARS?

        I have written above about the destruction of Mars. Specifically I refer to evidence brought forth by Professor John Brandenburg about a possible nuclear war fought on Mars in the very distant past. While he originally wrote about a natural event, he went on to argue that two airburst hydrogen bombs were dropped by aliens. Specifically, on page 179 of Life and Death on Mars, The New Mars Synthesis, Brandenburg states of his hypothesis to explain radioactive isotopes on Mars that are usually associated with nuclear weapons, "...This is a much more complex hypothesis than natural nuclear reactors. It involves not just great intelligence, but also great malice. Therefore, the absence of a crater (leading Brandenburg to imply an air burst) means that we must leave open the possibility that Mars was the site of interstellar genocide on a planetary scale, like the planet Alderan of Star Wars." Figure 1 points toward such a war. Figure 4 above shows where the weapons may have detonated on Mars, what the isotopic clues are, and a small matrix linking ATOMIC HOLOCAUST with the simple transliteration of MARS used on Figure 1, although this time it is at skip -1.

       Returning to the question of Torah Authorship raised with Figure 1, in Figure 5 the axis term is SIGNAL FROM FUTURE. I was astonished to find JERUSALEM at the same skip just 2 columns right of it. This match occurred against odds of about 1,814 to 1. One line under SIGNAL FROM FUTURE and centered about it is FROM MOUNT SINAI. At the same absolute skip as but in the opposite direction of SIGNAL FROM FUTURE and JERUSALEM is THE ALIEN. In the open text is THE TEMPLE and UFO. This matrix is much more significant than I'd like to see. It occurs against odds of about about 132,500,832 to 1. As such, the matrix raises fundamental theological questions of the highest nature. As for the UFO shown over Temple Mount on Figure 5, videos and worthwhile commentary are found at http://nationalufocenter.com/2014/01/are-the-videos-taken-over-jerusalem-real-or-fake/.