WAS THE DNC HACKER RUSSIA, ISRAEL OR A BERNIE BACKER?
WikiLeaks Boss Julian Assange says it was not Russia or a State. Could the hack have been done by a disgruntled Bernie Sanders fan? This page updated on 1/4/2017
Obama has claimed that Vladimir Putin and Russia were behind hacking the Democratic National Committee and that this cost Clinton the election. If he’s right, then for showing us what an enemy of the U.S. Clinton and the Democrats really are then patriotic Americans should have only two words for Putin in this case – THANK YOU. Obama and his Democratic cohorts ensured that Iran will get nuclear weapons He gave Iran a $151.7 billion gift to pay for those weapons. And he backed a successful effort in the U.N. to condemn Israel. Thus Israel’s Netanyahu also had reason to bring down the Democrats. On the matrix below there are two transliterations of PUTIN that cross and share a letter with the axis term DEMOCRATIC. RUSSIA is at skip -1, and the noun HACK is at skip +9. However NETANYAHU is at skip +1, and ISRAEL is also in the open text. This matrix shows that Putin is a better suspect, but this may well be a case where Netanyahu was only too willing to help him accomplish a common purpose.
Figure 1 above: The strongest indictment of PUTIN occurs with the 3rd lowest skip of axis term DEMOCRATIC, but this matrix suggests reason to suspect NETANYAHU too. The odds calculation is shown below.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURES 1 AND 2. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, here DEMOCRATIC at its third lowest skip in wrapped Torah on Figure 1, and lowest skip on Figure 2. NETANYAHU appeared at skip +1 on Figure 1 against odds of about 27 to 1, and NETANYAHU was on Figure 2 against odds of about 20 to 1. Figure 1 made a much stronger case against Putin and Russia, with two transliterations crossing and sharing a letter with DEMOCRATIC in a 96-letter box. The better 5-letter spelling of PUTIN was on Figure 1 against odds of about 18.5 to 1, but the weaker 4-letter letter spelling of PUTIN had about a 62% chance to be somewhere on the matrix. RUSSIAN was on Figure 1 at a special case skip (+/-1 or the absolute skip of the axis term) against odds of about 43.7 to 1. Other terms on Figure 1 had anywhere from 23.5% to 74.5% chance to be found. Overall, Figure 1 was found against odds of about 68,292 to 1, but attention should be focused on NETANYAHU and PUTIN/RUSSIAN.
Bernie (Sanders) is not on Figure 1. He is on Figure 2, but not at a special case skip and he had over a 99% to be on a matrix that large (975 letters). Other than NETANYAHU appearing against odds of about 20 to 1, the only other significant term was NATIONAL (as in DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE) which was found at skip +1 against odds of about 78.6 to 1. If we count it, then the matrix appeared against odds of about 6,374 to 1, but I don't think we should. It lends no information about who was behind the hack, or even that the hack occurred. Removing it from consideration left us with a matrix with combined odds against it of only 81 to 1, which is not significant. Seeing this led me to start a new with a better axis term shown on Figures 3 and 4 - WIKILEAKS, and those matrices, combined with statements made by Julian Assange of WikiLeaks lead me to believe that a Bernie Sanders friend or fan was behind the hack (if that is what it can be called). Of serious note - John Podesta who was hacked the most had a "password" on his computer that he gave away. What was it? PASSWORD!!!!!!!!! That borders on criminal idiocy.
Figure 2 - The minimum skip of axis term DEMOCRATIC has ISRAEL touch it, but NETANYAHU, while at skip +1, is not as close as it was on Figure 1. RUSSIAN and PUTIN are on the matrix, but not at special case skips. This matrix is not strong enough to indict anyone.
This is the spreadsheet for calculating the significance for Figure 1. The combined odds look interesting with NATIONAL at skip +1. The word was sought while looking for the 3 parts of the term DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, but the word does not help us see who was responsible for the hack. Without counting it the matrix is not yet significant, but one or two major additional finds could change this conclusion. As for ISRAEL appearing in the open text with DEMOCRATIC in 40 letters, without considering the issue of conflicting letters, odds against it were about 13.4 to 1.
Figure 3 uses the modern Hebrew spelling of WIKILEAKS (ending in a samech) as an axis term and pairs it with a verb at skip +1 meaning HACK, and a transliteration of CLINTON at skip -1. BERNIE and a weak transliteration of TRUMP touch WIKILEAKS. Odds against this matrix were about 8,613 to 1.
Figure 4 below shows the best pairing of BERNIE with WIKILEAKS. However it also shows that NETANYAHU and ISRAEL are at skip +1. BERNIE is at the same absolute skip as WIKILEAKS with is spelling of WikiLeaks ending with the other Hebrew letter for S - a shin/sin. This matrix was found against odds of about 868 to 1.
Spreadsheets showing how the statistical significance of Figures 3 and 4 were calculated.