TRUMP POINTS TO AMERICANS ON OTHER WORLDS BY 2026
But as with other anti-Establishment issues, he needs to be made aware of security concerns. Updated on 3/3/2017.
On Figure 1 the axis term is MARS FOOTSTEPS which was sought in conjunction with President Trump's call for American footprints on distant worlds. The two closest such worlds that we are likely to visit are our moon again, and Mars. The man who will send two tourists around the moon by the end of 2018 is Elon Musk. Both names are parallel to MARS FOOTSTEPS, although not at special case skips (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term). ELON is at twice the absolute skip of the axis term, and MUSK is at three times that skip. There is an ELS of THE MOON at skip -1, and another of TO THE MOON at skip +2. The second-best spelling of TRUMP was found on the matrix, but PRESIDENT in the open text which was not close to his name. Instead it shared the letter nun with the last letter of ELON. This raises a question of whether Musk has a route to the White House that goes through the moon and Mars. Previously he has declared a desire to live on Mars.
Interim Note to My Friends in DoD and MIT. I saw your presence here before I had a chance to finish this article. I assume that you will return when it's done. The DoD-MIT link is constant, and appreciated. However, if, as I assume, you are both here to learn what data can be gleaned from the Code for purposes of military intelligence it would be better for you to contact me directly. I say this because most articles that I produce are cranked out in a day or two, and often the more time I spend on a matrix the more I can discover. It has long been my belief that I can focus on a topic in a more thorough manner if there is two way contact between my intel friends and myself. As an example, when I searched for PRESIDENT on this matrix, I expected to see it come up in the open text close to TRUMP. However, it came up sharing a letter nun with ELON. ELON, MUSK, and MARS FOOTPRINTS were not at the same skip, but were parallel to each other. If Elon Musk successfully takes Americans to the moon and Mars, he may well be the next billionaire to run for president. Here, while the terms were all sought a priori, the term location relationships were only discovered accidentally after they were found. I am a retired U.S. military officer. As such, I'm always ready (Semper Paratus) to help our military accomplish what is in our national interests so long as they are in line with the Constitution of the United States.
Figure 2 below shows an artistically enhanced picture of what the Falcon Heavy rocket would look like with a Space Launch System (SLS) rocket on a launch pad nearby. It is, however, doubteful that both rockets would be out on the launch pads at the same time because an explosion of one might destroy the second.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 1. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the only transliteration/translation found for MARS FOOTSTEPS in unwrapped or wrapped Torah. While my protocol allows for extra statistical value for a priori terms at skips +/- 1 and at the absolute skip of the axis term, it does not allow for extra value when terms are merely parallel to the axis term (i.e., at some multiple of the axis term) as is the case here with ELON and MUSK. On the full 1,064-letter matrix there was about a 34% chance to find MUSK at an ELS and about a 53.4% chance to find ELON at an ELS. TRUMP was more significant. Odds against finding it on the full matrix were about 10.7 to 1. This increased to about 26.7 to 1 on the segment of the matrix with a white background, but eliminating the segment of the matrix with the gray background eliminates MUSK and ROCKET (which was found on the full matrix at a special case skip against odds of about 8.46 to 1). PRESIDENT was found in the open text on the full matrix against odds of about 4.7 to 1, but this allows for no extra value for the sharing a letter nun with ELON. TO THE MOON was found at an ELS against odds of about 4.5 to 1. Overall, the full matrix was found against odds of about 13,947 to 1. As to whether the matrix would have been more significant if I had just shown the 646 letters with a white background, the answer is no. Odds against the smaller matrix were about 12,891 to 1. As for whether my statistical methods are the best possible, it is true that other methods may produce different results. If, before the experiment, I had specified enhanced value for words that shared letters, or were parallel but only at some multiple of the skip of the axis term, I would have produced more impressive numbers, but that would be cheating. Over 20 years of research the only extra values that I have argued for are on ELS maps that show a course angle of exactly 251.565 degrees True from Temple Mount on Jerusalem to the site in El Zuqba, Egypt where I believe the Ark of the Covenant will be found.
ABOUT SPLITING A NAME. You probably noticed above that when the name Elon Musk was split into two terms, ELON and MUSK, neither term was very significant. This is generally the rule in the Torah Code. It's best to use both names together, or to use a first letter followed by the last name. Ideally the name is the axis term, and is 8 letters long. This is the case below in Figure 3 where the axis term is ELON MUSK and we find SABOTAGE at the same absolute skip (although opposite direction), and at skip +1 AND THEY TRAVELLED - MARS.
Figure 3 - ELON MUSK is encoded at the same absolute skip as SABOTAGE, and with MARS at skip +1. There have been questions about sabotage of two of his Falcon 9 rockets before. This matrix show that Musk must plan for the highest degree of security for any future mission to Mars.
In my article about the loss of the ExoMars 2016 Schiaparelli lander, I included the following concerns that relate to Elon Musk and his worries about sabotage. I know that our intelligence community has read this on my other sites. So has the European Space Agency - many times. But most of the readers here don't visit my MarsCorrect.com site, or that of my son at Davidaroffman.com. Anyway, those sites don't have Figure 3 shown above, so for all my military and civilian readers it's best to look at the combined Codes issues here with the mission concerns given on my other sites.
DARKER CONCERNS. And what of the darker concern? I don't want to put too much emphasis on this because it's all too easy to slip into speculation and thus cheapen the value of the data that we have, but briefly I live in an ocean-front condominium in Cape Canaveral, Florida. A good number of my neighbors work at the Kennedy Space Center or Canaveral Air Force Station. There are several units in our condo that at owned by Elon Musk, the owner of SpaceX. Hours before the second successful landing here of SpaceX on July 17, 2017 which I personally witnessed, I spoke with a top SpaceX director who was at our pool. After explaining the MarsCorrect research data, I warned him that if the NASA data was not due to human error, SpaceX would need to pay serious attention to mission security. A few months later on September 1, 2016 a SpaceX Falcon 9 blew up on the launch pad here. Things went wrong as SpaceX fueled the 230-foot Falcon 9 during a practice countdown, part of preparations for a planned September 3 launch of a communications satellite for Israeli company Spacecom.
On September 30, 2016 The Washington Post published an article entitled Implication of sabotage adds intrigue to SpaceX investigation. In it they point out Musk's concern about images from video that appeared to show an odd shadow, then a white spot on the roof of a nearby building leased by United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint venture between Lockheed Martin and Boeing. There was also a noise just before the explosion that some people think might have been a gunshot. Further, Musk's request for access to the roof of the ULA building (about a mile from the explosion) was denied. My friends who work at SpaceX are not supposed to talk about what happened, but they point out a fierce and bitter rivalry with ULA that is in part due to the fact that SpaceX can launch vehicles into orbit for a far lower price than ULA can. As such, Reuters reports that ULA was due to layoff 875 workers by the end of 2017. That alone could provide motivation for a vicious act.
There were other concerns about the September 1, 2016 explosion. It carried an Israeli satellite that could have inspired an attack by hostile agents from the Middle East. But, if there was a sniper on the ULA roof, it should be noted that nobody is permitted to be closer than 3 miles to a rocket being fueled. Here the distance was only about 1 mile. Somebody had to have access that would normally not have been granted.
When I warned the SpaceX official about a possible attack I didn't know about the great rivalry (I hear hatred) between SpaceX and ULA. Nor did I know about the planned $250,000,000 Israeli Amos satellite that would be lost. My concern was simply based on the fact that Musk created SpaceX for one reason only - getting to Mars (possibly by as early as 2022). I was (and am) concerned that if NASA is keeping people from Mars, and possibly falsifying data about the Red Planet, then they might be trying to hide something vital enough to destroy SpaceX and/or any manned Mars mission. I discuss these concerns in the Afterword of our Basic Report. It's noteworthy that as of 2017 no other nation has yet successfully landed a functioning spacecraft on Mars. How can NASA remove any cloud of suspicion that we cast on their reputation? Publically acknowledge that they read this site and our other sites on a near daily basis, and explain why they do so. Better, acknowledge that they know their weather data is as flawed as we prove it is in our Basic Report. A link to the latest version of our report, MARS CORRECT - CRITIQUE OF ALL NASA WEATHER DATA can be found at the Contents page of my son's site.
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FIGURE 3. As per my usual protocol, no statistical significance was assigned to the axis term, here the only transliteration/translation found for ELON MUSK in unwrapped or wrapped Torah. Odds against having both MARS at skip +1 and a special case skip find for SABOTAGE in 180 letters with ELON MUSK were about 119,972. The matrix is thus judged to be extremely significant - certainly worthy of attention by SpaceX. They visit this site occasionally, but not at anywhere near the frequency of NASA (about twice a day) or the Department of Defense (about once per day).