IMPEACHMENT OF OBAMA OVER HEALTHCARE DISASTER?
There is cause to impeach, but is there the courage? (THIS PAGE WILL BE UPDATED TO INCLUDE THE BERGDAHL ENEMY SWAP SCANDAL. ( 6/5/2013)
I discussed the impeachment of Obama before back on 9/15/2011. The first serious Democratic National Committee concern about was expressed in an e-mail on December 28, 2013. The email, subject line “Impeachment,” was sent to Obama for America supporters, imploring them to contribute to the DNC’s 2014 efforts. “What do these people all have in common?,” the email asked, featuring quotes from Republican Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Rep. Kerry Bentivolio of Michigan, and Rep. Blake Farenthold of Texas discussing the possibility of impeaching Obama for one of his numerous instances of presidential misconduct. On the matrix below the axis term is IMPEACHMENT OBAMA. PRESIDENT is in the open text. There is an ELS of EVIL FORECASTING that touches IMPEACHMENT OBAMA. In the open text is DO NOT HARM ONE ANOTHER. The matrix also has one ELS of HEALTH and two of CRIME. If people lose their health care due to Obama’s incompetence and deceit and then start to die as a result of his actions, impeachment would seem to be the only recourse of his previous congressional allies, not because it is right (which it is), but only because all they care about is the 2014 election and their own power.
STATISTICAL AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MATRIX. As per my standard protocol, no statistical significance is assigned to the axis term, here IMPEACHMENT (of) OBAMA at its 2nd lowest ELS in wrapped Torah. Against odds of about 6.5 to 1, PRESIDENT was found in the open text. The terms HEALTH and CRIME were not statistically significant largely because they do not appear at any special case skips (+/- 1 or the absolute skip of the axis term). What is of interest here are the terms EVIL FORECASTING and DO NOT HARM ONE ANOTHER. The term DO NOT HARM ONE ANOTHER was in mind because Obama has harmed an enormous number of people and he should be held accountable to them, to the point of losing his job. It appeared on the matrix against odds of about 405 to 1. The problem is with respect to how to handle EVIL FORECASTING. The 3-letter word EVIL was absolutely to be expected somewhere on the matrix. It adds no real value to it. But the 6-letter term appears against odds of about 405 to 1 again. There are, however, caveats that must be stated. The biggest one is with the spelling of FORECASTING. The spelling used here, zayin vav yud, was found on Google Translate. However when I go the opposite way, from English to Hebrew, the same dictionary requires a letter chet before zayin vav yud. If I allow the 6-letter term, EVIL FORECASTING then the matrix exists against odds of about 610,930 to 1. If I do not allow it for statistical calculation purposes, then the matrix exists against odds of about 1,523 to 1. Even if the spelling is correct, the latter probability is better for one reason. The term EVIL FORECASTING was only found by a combination snooping and Google Translates. Snooping is not an a-priori technique of finding key words on a matrix. So while snooping often produces very interesting terms, under standard protocol, I don't use snooped words to determine probability.
As for what it all means in reality, neither Benghazi, nor a possible birth of Obama in Kenya, nor accumlation of unbelievable national debt, nor failure of Obama to stop Iran's nuclear bomb program, nor his unfulfilled Syrian red line threat, nor any of the other crimes commited by the imposter in the White House has yet led to his impeachment. I don't know that it ever will occur. The people of the United States were not only foolish enough to elect this man and Nancy Pelosi who said of ObamaCare, "But we have to pass the (health care) bill so that you can find out what's in it," but they also elected Harry Reid, who is the Democratic Senate Majority leader, and of course they elected a Senate with a majority of seats filled by Democrats. Any impeachment trial must be held there, and even an impeachment does not imply a conviction. Wikipedia states of the process that:
At the federal level, Article II of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." The House of Representatives has the sole power of impeaching, while the United States Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments. The removal of impeached officials is automatic upon conviction in the Senate.
So while the Republican House can start the process, it's up to the Democratic Senate to finish it. Conviction requires 67 votes there. Currently there are only 47 Republicans senators. So the process would require the cooperation of 20 senators who are Democratic (51) and/or who are Independent (2). Perhaps an even bigger impediment to conviction is that any vote to impeach or convict will be called racist. The fear of that is Obama's secret weapon to enslaving our nation.